It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -Aristotle
Also, it's should HAVE. NOT "should of". "Should of" doesn't even make sense. If you think you should own a cat, do you say "I should of a cat" or "I should have a cat"? Do you HAVE cats, or do you OF cats?
We have yet to see Guilds rejecting applicants who wear these helmets and after that I've seen everything.
For such stuff the VK option has protective modes.. You VK people frequently, then enjoy your inability to vk for several hours. And since you make your practice public so nicely, you can bet your ass on it, how Blizzard is going to counter it with appropriate mechanics. It's fun if you may end up being unable to VK at all, when it would really matter...
Regarding haters.... I believe you confusing the definition of it.. The only hater I see would be you
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
This almost makes me want to shoehorn a store helm into a transmog set, almost.
We have felled demon commanders, cowed the master of death, conquered Old Gods, and stopped the Aspect of Death from destroying the very planet. Now, we need to kill this dude who managed to enslave pudding eating panda's, slobbering sauroks, and hilariously inept hozen. Awesome. Really epic.
Hahaha WoW community
LFR Raid ~
Guild Group: Holy fuck those 4 people have that shitastic fanboy helm lets kick them
Other people of the raid: How about Apathy whos afk 99% of the time in the fights look I even have evidence
Guild Group: Fuck that he/she didn't buy the fan boy helm LET JUSTICE BE SERVED
Other people of the raid: err... that doesn't make sense
- You have been removed from the group -
JUSTICE IS SERVED
Pathetic hell lower then pathetic.
Opened the mail and saw this: Blizzard Entertainment Europe [EN] - Notice of Permanent Account Suspension
-Well sorry, because you made pvp suck so hard i had to do something and i found Goldshire rping to be the only fun left in this game but it didnt last long xD
You're trying to imply that the above, bolded isn't happening? Most of the support for what is happening I have seen is "yes that serves them right. Those dumb-asses that bought the store items deserve it!"
Plus, I believe you're a bit blinded. Why would anyone need a proper counter-argument against this? This isn't a matter of opinion or viewpoints. People doing this are factually childish and petty.
If you really think that people need to concoct an argument against why you would not harass people and hinder the game-time they spend money on by kicking them over them buying some hat they might like, then perhaps you should really listen to what people said. Chances are that you won't. You'll just name another logical fallacy and change the subject a little to twist and turn away from the truth.
But that doesn't matter, ser Anarchor. I have still said it. The hypocrisy from you will be a fond memory. :>