Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ...
7
8
9
10
11
LastLast
  1. #161
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquamonkey View Post
    Nope. Never disbanded. US doesn't become a new country when the President changes. Or any Kingdom when the king changes. Or any company when the CEO changes.
    same with horde if there are same members and new members join its still US and they just changed CEO :P

  2. #162
    The Insane Aquamonkey's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Universe
    Posts
    18,149
    Quote Originally Posted by Ianus View Post
    same with horde if there are same members and new members join its still US and they just changed CEO :P
    Nope. The orcs in the internment camps were disbanded from the Horde. They didn't join the continuation in the Dark Horde. They formed a new organization.

    Like those devs from Blizzard that left and made their own company. They didn't make Blizzard over again.

  3. #163
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquamonkey View Post
    Doesn't matter if every single member is the same. The original organization was disbanded. Them coming together again makes it a new organization.
    Lets say a band is playing a show, a huge fight break out and all the band members are arrested. The band breaks up, but after getting out of the slammer, the lead singer recruits new members and restarts his band with the same name as the old band. Is it really the same band? Sorta yes, sorta no.

  4. #164
    Quote Originally Posted by Trassk View Post
    Maybe if the alliance asked to have one of its characters become the bad guy and add some contrast to your faction, you might get some depth to it.

    This is why the horde has more interesting story, because it has its share of good guys and bad guys in it, well the alliance keeps perpetuating itself as holy-good-boys, and thats.. really boring.
    I was unaware that the players wrote the lore for this game. Last time I checked it was Metzen, the Horde lover, that wrote it.

  5. #165
    Elemental Lord
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Behind You
    Posts
    8,667
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquamonkey View Post
    Nope. The orcs in the internment camps were disbanded from the Horde.
    likewise, the Orcish Horde was crushed after the war
    some remenants formed the dark horde
    others formed the fel horde
    others formed the new horde
    and others stayed put in Garadar
    We have faced trials and danger, threats to our world and our way of life. And yet, we persevere. We are the Horde. We will not let anything break our spirits!"

  6. #166
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquamonkey View Post
    Nope. The orcs in the internment camps were disbanded from the Horde. They didn't join the continuation in the Dark Horde. They formed a new organization.
    i give up u cant be reasoned with ...if alliance was the same they would have lordaeron in their name..
    Last edited by Ianus; 2013-08-02 at 04:28 AM.

  7. #167
    Quote Originally Posted by Ianus View Post
    i give up u cant be reasoned with ...if alliance was the same they would have lordaeron in their name..
    Except you're ignoring facts and reason. The alliance never disbanded as far as I can recall.

    Did some things change? Sure. That doesn't mean the organization is different though.

    As for the Horde, it could have all members made up of the Old Horde, that doesn't mean it's the same. The Old Horde was disbanded. A new one was formed, and the goals are different. All of the members very well COULD be the same (and they aren't, considering there are other races in the Horde), that doesn't mean it's the same, especially if the goals are different.

  8. #168
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreknar20 View Post
    likewise, the Orcish Horde was crushed after the war
    some remenants formed the dark horde
    others formed the fel horde
    others formed the new horde
    and others stayed put in Garadar
    In the aftermath of the interment camps the Orcs got a second chance to follow a new path if they wished. Instead they formed an army, called it the Horde, named thier leader "Warchief" and drank Mannoroth's blood again.

    I'll just let Dave Chapelle explain http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K1KHqi9bXc

  9. #169
    The Insane Aquamonkey's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Universe
    Posts
    18,149
    Quote Originally Posted by Jinx16 View Post
    In the aftermath of the interment camps the Orcs got a second chance to follow a new path if they wished. Instead they formed an army, called it the Horde, named thier leader "Warchief" and drank Mannoroth's blood again.

    I'll just let Dave Chapelle explain http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K1KHqi9bXc
    ...And aided in the defense of the planet. And were so different that Jaina stood against her father to preserve the peace she had made between the Alliance and Horde.

    "After much soul-searching, Jaina chose the latter and helped Thrall defeat her crazed father. Unfortunately Admiral Proudmoore died in battle before Jaina could reconcile with him or prove that orcs were no longer bloodthirsty monsters."
    Last edited by Aquamonkey; 2013-08-02 at 05:07 AM.

  10. #170
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquamonkey View Post
    ...And aided in the defense of the planet. And were so different that Jaina stood against her father to preserve the peace she had made between the Alliance and Horde.

    "After much soul-searching, Jaina chose the latter and helped Thrall defeat her crazed father. Unfortunately Admiral Proudmoore died in battle before Jaina could reconcile with him or prove that orcs were no longer bloodthirsty monsters."
    Dude, I agree, the Orcs are not bloody monsters anymore. However, they surrounded themselves in the trappings of bloody monsters. They adopted the brand of the first Horde, I think this was a stupid move, but there it is. If you name your band "The Rolling Stones" you can't be mad when people ask "Where's Mick Jagger?"

  11. #171
    I am Murloc! Scummer's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,262
    Quote Originally Posted by GennGreymane View Post
    Why are they not playing up Miora! that dark iron betch
    Moira's cool and I really like what they're doing with her. She's in 5.3 and in 5.4. Hopefully we'll see the other leaders get developed too so that council doesn't become lop sided. Ofcourse Moira is pretty new to the story as a whole having been in BRD the whole time so it's only natural that she's first in line.

  12. #172
    Elemental Lord
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    8,868
    Quote Originally Posted by Antoine de Coolette View Post
    Notice how WoW's Alliance hasn't been properly engineered into a reservoir from which storylines and momentum can be effortlessly gathered for current and future use. Entire Onyxia debacle was the last immersive storyline that could be squeezed out from this assortment of generic and shallow material that this faction chiefly consists of.
    You disagree with me by agreeing with me?

    WoW developers face a task that is becoming harder and harder with each passing packet of content: make Alliance into a pool of inspiration both for Alliance related content and gameplay experience for those of us who have chosen to main this faction.
    And they can do that in any XPac they choose. The Allaince is already established. They just aren't being used.

    THERE IS SIMPLY NO TIME LEFT ANYMORE FOR BLIZZARD TO FLESH OUT ALLIANCE, take from that what you will.
    There is no deadline.

    Yes, I do believe that expansions will cease at lvl 100.
    Then you are wrong. There is no reason to stop at 100.

    past level 100 any more level brackets would make it insanely hard and frustrating for any newcomer to reach endgame - place where the best fun is had.
    As is the assumption there is no way around this, if it even becomes an issue.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aquamonkey View Post
    ...And aided in the defense of the planet. And were so different that Jaina stood against her father to preserve the peace she had made between the Alliance and Horde.

    "After much soul-searching, Jaina chose the latter and helped Thrall defeat her crazed father. Unfortunately Admiral Proudmoore died in battle before Jaina could reconcile with him or prove that orcs were no longer bloodthirsty monsters."

    And she has since concluded she was wrong. That while her experience of Thrall and other is valid, many actually are bloodthirsty monsters

    EJL

  13. #173
    Stood in the Fire mjolnir1122's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Colville, WA
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by Trassk View Post
    Maybe if the alliance asked to have one of its characters become the bad guy and add some contrast to your faction, you might get some depth to it.

    This is why the horde has more interesting story, because it has its share of good guys and bad guys in it, well the alliance keeps perpetuating itself as holy-good-boys, and thats.. really boring.
    Thing is though is that if you flesh out the characters enough, give the players more to work with in-game, then even though they might be all holy-good-boys, they wouldn't have such a linear personification. Look at Varian, he's had quite a bit of ups and downs, twists and turns. But most probably don't know why he went from a bloodthirsty warrior to a calculating, intelligent commander who mixes brains with brawn. If more of his past struggle was displayed or made available in-game, it would make his character more immersive.

    All of the Alliance leaders are actually pretty damn cool if you dig up their full lore. It's just not represented in-game, and to me that's a waste. Many people aren't going to go out of their way to read a book or a 12 page short story on a fictional character, so the actual audience they're speaking to by going about it in that way isn't the smartest.

    I just hope they learn from their mistakes and start fleshing out all of the leaders, both Horde and Alliance, in the coming years. It would put Blizz in a good spot lore wise and maybe even bring back some of the immersiveness back into the game.

  14. #174
    The Insane Aquamonkey's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Universe
    Posts
    18,149
    Quote Originally Posted by Talen View Post
    And she has since concluded she was wrong. That while her experience of Thrall and other is valid, many actually are bloodthirsty monsters
    No. Bloodthirsty monsters are "Rawr, smash!" Garrosh attacked the Alliance in a calculated manner and had legitimate grievance.

  15. #175
    Quote Originally Posted by Xarnius View Post
    Hello everyone, this is a thread where I simply ask, what do we get as alliance players lore-wise?

    The whole Garrosh scene has been really big for the horde, and it's a huge part of the horde's lore.

    I feel that as an alliance player, we don't get enough lore to think about & lore that really affects us. The Ironforge leadership thing wasn't really that big, and didn't get as much attention as it deserved.
    You have to think, The Burning Crusader and WOTLK were HIGHLY packed with alliance lore, more then horde. So where is the pain in having cata and MoP give horde alot of lore? How do you think they felt during TBC and WOTLK where the two main big bads originated from the alliance factions. llidan a night elf, Arthas the prince of lordaeron and a human, tirion who helped defeat arthas, along with it was almost fully the alliance army which invaded the citadel. Bolvar who takes the place as the next lich king, who was also an alliance solider ect, And then finished it all off with the return of their king ect.

    As a horde player I honestly feel bad the alliance do get screwed over next patch but hell, they have had a shit ton of lore development in the past well the horde got non.

  16. #176
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquamonkey View Post
    No. Bloodthirsty monsters are "Rawr, smash!" Garrosh attacked the Alliance in a calculated manner and had legitimate grievance.
    Yeah, his legitimate grievance was "Kill Alliance scuuuuuum!"

  17. #177
    Elemental Lord
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Behind You
    Posts
    8,667
    Quote Originally Posted by Talen View Post
    And she has since concluded she was wrong. That while her experience of Thrall and other is valid, many actually are bloodthirsty monsters
    Orcs are no more monsters/evil than any other race
    We have faced trials and danger, threats to our world and our way of life. And yet, we persevere. We are the Horde. We will not let anything break our spirits!"

  18. #178
    I am Murloc! Viradiance's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    AFK in boralus
    Posts
    5,178
    Quote Originally Posted by Trassk View Post
    Maybe if the alliance asked to have one of its characters become the bad guy and add some contrast to your faction, you might get some depth to it.

    This is why the horde has more interesting story, because it has its share of good guys and bad guys in it, well the alliance keeps perpetuating itself as holy-good-boys, and thats.. really boring.
    *clears throat, unfurls list*

    Arthas Menethil
    Illidan Stormrage
    Maiev Shadowsong
    Sylvanas Windrunner (don't act like she wasn't Alliance before she was killed and raised into the Lich Queen)
    Fandral Staghelm
    Kel'thuzad

    Names a few...
    Steve Irwin died the same way he lived. With animals in his heart.

  19. #179

  20. #180
    I am Murloc! Viradiance's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    AFK in boralus
    Posts
    5,178
    Quote Originally Posted by mjolnir1122 View Post
    Thing is though is that if you flesh out the characters enough, give the players more to work with in-game, then even though they might be all holy-good-boys, they wouldn't have such a linear personification. Look at Varian, he's had quite a bit of ups and downs, twists and turns. But most probably don't know why he went from a bloodthirsty warrior to a calculating, intelligent commander who mixes brains with brawn. If more of his past struggle was displayed or made available in-game, it would make his character more immersive.

    All of the Alliance leaders are actually pretty damn cool if you dig up their full lore. It's just not represented in-game, and to me that's a waste. Many people aren't going to go out of their way to read a book or a 12 page short story on a fictional character, so the actual audience they're speaking to by going about it in that way isn't the smartest.

    I just hope they learn from their mistakes and start fleshing out all of the leaders, both Horde and Alliance, in the coming years. It would put Blizz in a good spot lore wise and maybe even bring back some of the immersiveness back into the game.
    Burning Crusade: lolno. Homeworld of the Orcs, adopted world of the Draenei. Draenei lore ended pretty quickly, never getting as far as the raid level, and was totally Blood Elf lore by the end (Half of Black Temple, Sunwell, The Eye).

    Wrath of the Lich King: Moreso than Burning Crusade, arguably. Tauren and Dwarves both uncover long lost ancient relatives. Forsaken faction schism, large scale forsaken military movement against the Lich King. Small bit of Gnome lore. Reasonable bit of Blood Elf lore (via Sunreavers, Quel'delar). Minor Night Elf lore (failed world tree). 0 Draenei lore (what the fuck else is new?). Major human lore. Little Orc lore. Little Troll lore (not the right kind of trolls, at least).
    Steve Irwin died the same way he lived. With animals in his heart.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •