View Poll Results: Weakest WoW Expansion

Voters
1482. You may not vote on this poll
  • BC

    127 8.57%
  • WotLK

    59 3.98%
  • Cataclysm

    1,075 72.54%
  • MoP

    221 14.91%
Page 1 of 21
1
2
3
11
... LastLast
  1. #1
    Warchief Ron Burgundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the mountains
    Posts
    2,154

    Weakest WoW Expansion

    in ur opinion, what was the weakest overall expansion?
    Milk was a bad choice.

    2013 MMO-Champion User of the Year (2nd runner up)

  2. #2
    Cataclysm. It felt very disconnected with the different zones here and there, and players want to feel a bigger sense of "place" that cataclysm didn't offer like all the other expansions.

  3. #3
    Stood in the Fire DaHomieG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Cliffside Park, New Jersey
    Posts
    488
    Wrath.

    /10char

  4. #4
    Pit Lord Worgoblin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Vanilla WoW servers
    Posts
    2,282
    Cataclysm. Though it did give us Worgen (my favorite race!), so I can't complain too much.

  5. #5
    The Patient Divinism's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    319
    Behold, as this thread fills with cataclysm.

  6. #6
    cata !
    i realy did not like cata ^^

  7. #7
    Warchief Ron Burgundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the mountains
    Posts
    2,154
    Quote Originally Posted by RetardFilter View Post
    Hello guys! Offering my services once more:



    No need to thank me guys!
    your services sucks
    Milk was a bad choice.

    2013 MMO-Champion User of the Year (2nd runner up)

  8. #8
    Dreadlord Orikon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    956
    Cataclysm hate comments incoming guys. :P Its gonna be cataclysmic.
    This profile doesn't have a signature.

  9. #9
    Elemental Lord Teriz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Beach City
    Posts
    8,606
    Fighting Deathwing's head and arms was an underwhelming end to an underwhelming expansion.

  10. #10
    Cataclysm....the failed to produced promised raids, and DS was a fairly disjointed and confusing raid, that seemed to be made up of the scraps from the abyssal maw raid. Also we never really got to fight Deathwing. Plus, even though I'm horde, Worgen can't be shaman, and that is just crazy. I mean shaman are all about wolves and worgen are WOLF PEOPLE, and that was the biggest disappointment

  11. #11
    It's a tough choice between Cata and TBC for me.

    TBC was just kinda weaksauce, IMO. Nothing about it really grips me and pulls me in.

    Cata, the individual areas were well crafted, but each one was basically an island.

    I will go with TBC as the weakest expansion. Cata failed on a collective level, but TBC failed on both an individual and collective level.

  12. #12
    Weakest in terms of what?

  13. #13
    it goes Cata>BC>Wotlk>MoP. Cataclysm was by far the best expansion imho.

  14. #14
    Cata. MoP isn't too far ahead though.

  15. #15
    Wrath without a doubt in my mind. Only era of WoW I've ever even thought about unsubbing.

  16. #16
    Dreadlord Basedqt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    California
    Posts
    790
    Cataclysm.
    Cataclysm.
    &
    Cataclysm.
    Gaming Rig
    Intel i5 3570k | MSI GTX 760 Twin Frozr | Corsair H80i | Asus z77 deluxe | Corsair Vengeance 8GB | Corsair CX600 | WD 1TB HDD | Samsung 256 840 Pro SSD
    Success is 99 percent failure. -Soichiro Honda
    <3 my DA9

  17. #17
    The Insane Trassk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Having beers with Dorothy
    Posts
    16,637
    Cata. So much of it felt rushed. The reusing of old content instead of making new content. The lack of anything to do at max level. The whole 'hopping though portals into different zones' aspect, and the overall story and character development for several lore characters was off.
    Big thanks to Davillage for awesome signature

  18. #18

  19. #19
    Not too shocking to see Cata pulling ahead quickly. Honestly, I think 75% of Cata's problems were simply that they sank so freakin' much of their resources into redoing Azeroth, that when they got to the actual content for the expansion left they were forced to scrape together just enough to be satisfactory. It may very well have been the weakest anyway, based on a rather poor final raid tier and confused identity (expansions w/o their own continent just don't make sense), but it sealed the deal by a mile, for me and a lot of others, when they simultaneously wasted so much effort on an excessive overhaul of a dated, but still perfectly functional, Azeroth. Imagine how improved the expansion might have been if they took 50% of that 1-60 effort and added it to 80-85 content. Guess we'll never know, but it seems like the answer in hind sight, and Blizz has pretty much concluded the same thing at this point.

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Trassk View Post
    Cata. So much of it felt rushed. The reusing of old content instead of making new content. The lack of anything to do at max level. The whole 'hopping though portals into different zones' aspect, and the overall story and character development for several lore characters was off.
    Pretty much for all the reasons he listed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •