Those numbers are to reflect the rppm changes, not t16 BiS
these sims are not accurate.
and expect not accurate sims for SoO. The fights have lots of adds, not even light movement can save it
that's probably single target
SoO have alot of multi target fights so Multi dotters will scale way up
some single are too low, Affliction Warlock is to high for the power that it will have on SoO, Affliction warlocks will probably destroy every multi fight
I wonder if there is any APL changes in that or if its just the T15H APL/Gear with 5.4 spell coefficients. Like for instance, come 5.4 demo will, most likely, not use UVLS and will go with a full crit set-up. So, if that's run using a UVLS and all haste set-up those numbers wouldn't be very accurate at all.
so Aff should be near SP, a nerf or a buff to SPs to equal Aff
As for demo, will do alot more damage than that also because of the adds
Destro we all knew after the rain of fire nerf that it will be bottom
damn was hoping some info from t16 gear
and i think that the spec deserve to shine somewhere since it was the worse spec for the entire expansion.
beside the scale of arms isnt good , so with gear the spec will be alot less than you think
Nice to see that ele is at the bottom of the meter.. again..
Don't think that going from T15 to T16 will be in ele's favor.. cause it's not. We all know ele scales horribly.
They want people to look at this chart, see where its wrong, and become angry enough to fix it themselves by contributing. As each class module has different amounts of work put into each one, they cannot be used to for comparision. Only within a single class will you get something useful - and even then, one spec might be more accurately simulated than another.The purpose of the spec ranking chart is to provoke a reaction, preferably a really really angry reaction. I want the viewer angry enough to pore through our voluminous data and say: "Hah! You messed up cooldown X!" or "You moron! Your action list is all wrong! You need to use ability Y instead!" I welcome the bile, the (creative) cursing, the ranting and raving, because usually there is kernel of useful information that I can extract to improve our models.
The spec ranking chart has proven to be one of our most important drivers of code quality. It is like waving a red flag in eyes of a rampaging bull. If it means I get trampled from time to time, so be it. That is just the cost of doing business.
SimC devs work for the users that understand that our models live in space between gospel and garbage, but we are not above taking advantage of those that live on extremes to help us in our task...
Where can i find this tests but using T16H gear?
Why do players look for sims to figure out what spec is best, sims work well for figuring out a rotation, stat priorities or whether a piece of gear is better then another. Comparing different spec/class numbers with them is silly.