Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
LastLast
  1. #1
    Merely a Setback breadisfunny's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    flying the exodar...into the sun.
    Posts
    25,923

    at the rate technology is advancing how long will it be before

    anti matter is a viable form of energy? will we see it in our lifetime? or will it be a bit longer or will it never happen?
    r.i.p. alleria. 1997-2017. blizzard ruined alleria forever. blizz assassinated alleria's character and appearance.
    i will never forgive you for this blizzard.

  2. #2
    The Insane Daelak's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    15,964
    Quote Originally Posted by breadisfunny View Post
    anti matter is a viable form of energy? will we see it in our lifetime? or will it be a bit longer or will it never happen?
    I think anti-matter will become a viable form of energy after we have created a dyson sphere.
    Quote Originally Posted by zenkai View Post
    There is a problem, but I know just banning guns will fix the problem.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by breadisfunny View Post
    anti matter is a viable form of energy? will we see it in our lifetime? or will it be a bit longer or will it never happen?
    Anti-matter will probably never be a viable source of energy. Not unless we find a source of it.

    First off, by itself antimatter acts no differently than normal matter (Excepting electric charge).

    Second, the only way to extract energy from antimatter is to annihilate it with matter. So if you have, say, 1 gram of antimatter, the only way to get energy out is by annihilating it with matter... which would yield a 1.8*1017 joule explosion. Rounded up that's 200 PJ... so about the size of the largest atomic weapon ever detonated. Yes, from 1 gram of antimatter.

    Then there's the matter of creating it which takes FAR more energy to do than you can get out of the other end.

    Then there's safe transport and storage (to avoid the aforementioned cataclysmic explosions).

    Not to mention the absurdly slow rate at which the stuff can be created.

    So if it were ever to be a viable source of energy... it won't be seen in our lifetimes.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Daelak View Post
    I think anti-matter will become a viable form of energy after we have created a dyson sphere.
    You mean after it's no longer needed?

  4. #4
    What are you asking? Viable is the completely wrong word to use when describing energy.

  5. #5
    Deleted
    As soon as we get our heads around Nuclear Fusion we shouldn't need any other source of energy. My personal belief anyway.

  6. #6
    Honorary PvM "Mod" Darsithis's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    51,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Daelak View Post
    I think anti-matter will become a viable form of energy after we have created a dyson sphere.
    I'll assume that's a joke because you'd be already able to harness the power of an entire star to build a dyson sphere anyway...

  7. #7
    The Insane Masark's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    17,976
    As a source? Never, unless current observations on baryon asymmetry are wrong.

    As a means of storage? If we ever find an efficient means of production and a large source of energy (e.g. cover Mercury in solar panels).

    Quote Originally Posted by Laize View Post
    Second, the only way to extract energy from antimatter is to annihilate it with matter. So if you have, say, 1 gram of antimatter, the only way to get energy out is by annihilating it with matter... which would yield a 1.8*1017 joule explosion. Rounded up that's 200 PJ... so about the size of the largest atomic weapon ever detonated. Yes, from 1 gram of antimatter.
    You've got a few too many zeros in there or you jumbled gram and kilogram. 2 grams *c^2 is 1.8*10^14 joules, which is about 2 Fat Mans worth of boom.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Darsithis View Post
    I'll assume that's a joke because you'd be already able to harness the power of an entire star to build a dyson sphere anyway...
    Sure. But you might take to take some of that power with you to run your 546371th generation iPod when you go on a day trip to OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb.

    Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
    What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mind
    Quote Originally Posted by Howard Tayler
    Political conservatism is just atavism with extra syllables and a necktie.
    Me on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW characters

  8. #8
    Legendary! Wikiy's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Virgo Supercluster, Local Group, Milky Way, Orion Arm, Solar System, Earth, European Union, Croatia
    Posts
    6,733
    I'm inclined to say never. Or, if that's really too arrogant , it's impossible to say (apparently, we folk who don't doubt science are always too definitive and too quick to discard ideas... apparently, we're close minded... oh, and everything's possible!). <---- sarcasm

    I wont even go over why antimatter probably won't be a viable source of energy, Laize has already done that, I'll just say that fusion power will give us practically unlimited amounts of energy. We wont even need to think about antimatter once we start using hydrogen from sea water to start up mini-suns all over the world. And that's happening within the next 50 years.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Laize View Post
    Then there's safe transport and storage (to avoid the aforementioned cataclysmic explosions).
    Why cant I explode?

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Masark View Post
    You've got a few too many zeros in there or you jumbled gram and kilogram. 2 grams *c^2 is 1.8*10^14 joules, which is about 2 Fat Mans worth of boom.
    You're right. I always do that.

    I sure do wish the metric system, as superior to imperial as it is, would be consistent in its use of units. It seems more than a little silly that you would use 1000 of the base unit (gram) for derivative units such as Newtons and Joules.

    And if it's just a convenience thing then why isn't the kg just the g and what is now called the gram would be the milligram.

  11. #11
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Darsithis View Post
    I'll assume that's a joke because you'd be already able to harness the power of an entire star to build a dyson sphere anyway...
    Damn Dyson are really upping thier suction power in thier vacuumes

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by d0oms View Post
    Damn Dyson are really upping thier suction power in thier vacuumes
    A Dyson Sphere is a basically a hypothesized structure capable of harnessing a significant portion of the energy output of a star.

    Imagine hundreds or thousands of satellites arranged in a sphere with a star at the center, collecting solar energy and beaming it back to power stations for use by civilization.

    Basically a structure like this would be the foundation of a Type II civilization.

    We're a long way away from there. Like... in terms of energy output (as a civilization) we're about 18 orders of magnitude away.

  13. #13
    Never.

    It takes a lot of energy to contain antimatter, and it is still susceptible to the laws of physics, so it will slowly quantum tunnel out of its magnetic containment field.

    Also, in a situation of 100% efficiency, it takes an equal amount of energy to produce antimatter as it is capable of releasing when annihilated. Because you have to smash particles together with immense force, and within the chaos of the collision you sometimes get the spontaneous formation of a particle along with its antiparticle. You then have to immediately segregate the two, which takes additional energy.

    So in order to create enough antimatter for a power plant you would end up exerting more energy producing and containing it than you would by reacting it. A lot more.

    So while it does have some very important uses (Positron Emission Tomography, for example) power generation is not one of them.

    Some antiparticles are created by the natural radioactive decay of certain elements, but that would not be enough for a power plant.

    Hydrogen and Helium are the 2 most abundant elements in the Universe, so coming up with a sustainable fusion reactor design is a far better idea than wasting time with antimatter. And there are international projects underway with the purpose of creating that reactor.

    And practical fusion reactors are really only missing either A. a chamber material capable of withstanding violent neutron bombardment, or B. a practical method of heating Helium-3 to its fusion point, which is much higher than Hydrogen.

    So essentially 1 scientific breakthrough can make controlled fusion power plants a reality. Whereas there's just too many obstacles for controlled antimatter reaction.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by breadisfunny View Post
    anti matter is a viable form of energy? will we see it in our lifetime? or will it be a bit longer or will it never happen?
    Too many special interest to even allow something like that to become public. Sorry but too many people employed by big oil and energy to do that. Welcome to the way this shit hole we call a world works. I personally wish the ice caps would melt right now and give a reality check sooner then later.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Puremallace View Post
    Too many special interest to even allow something like that to become public. Sorry but too many people employed by big oil and energy to do that. Welcome to way this shit hole we call a world works.
    You make my head hurt.

    You do realize that all of the oil and special interests in the world couldn't stop antimatter from becoming a reality (if it were possible given current technology) given its potential as a WMD the likes of which could make thermonuclear weapons look like bottle rockets... right?

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Laize View Post
    You make my head hurt.

    You do realize that all of the oil and special interests in the world couldn't stop antimatter from becoming a reality (if it were possible given current technology) given its potential as a WMD the likes of which could make thermonuclear weapons look like bottle rockets... right?
    Energy companies in Louisiana got a law passed that says if 0.5% of the energy from the grid comes from solar they can legally stop issuing net meters. Do not tell me that special interest do not control this company.

    My own Democrat senator post pictures of her sitting in boardrooms with big oil lobbyist on her Facebook. Texas and North Carolina are passing laws against selling electric cars.

    If you do not think for a second they would make anti matter illegal under some BS excuse that it could be weaponized you are on crack. If you think anything of significance will happen in this world within the next century to change shit you need help or a serious reality check.

    Here is what you do. If you discover this power source publish it on every single website on the internet you can find before they have a chance to stop you and lobby against it.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Puremallace View Post
    Energy companies in Louisiana got a law passed that says if 0.5% of the energy from the grid comes from solar they can legally stop issuing net meters. Do not tell me that special interest do not control this company.

    My own Democrat senator post pictures of her sitting in boardrooms with big oil lobbyist on her Facebook. Texas and North Carolina are passing laws against selling electric cars.

    If you do not think for a second they would make anti matter illegal under some BS excuse that it could be weaponized you are on crack. If you think anything of significance will happen in this world within the next century to change shit you need help or a serious reality check.

    Here is what you do. If you discover this power source publish it on every single website on the internet you can find before they have a chance to stop you and lobby against it.
    Even if your little conspiracy theory is 100% true. America isn't the center of the Universe. just FYI. In case you forgot, there's other countries with independent governments.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Puremallace View Post
    Energy companies in Louisiana got a law passed that says if 0.5% of the energy from the grid comes from solar they can legally stop issuing net meters. Do not tell me that special interest do not control this company.

    My own Democrat senator post pictures of her sitting in boardrooms with big oil lobbyist on her Facebook. Texas and North Carolina are passing laws against selling electric cars.

    If you do not think for a second they would make anti matter illegal under some BS excuse that it could be weaponized you are on crack. If you think anything of significance will happen in this world within the next century to change shit you need help or a serious reality check.

    Here is what you do. If you discover this power source publish it on every single website on the internet you can find before they have a chance to stop you and lobby against it.
    What do you not understand about the MIC being 100 times more powerful than the energy companies?

    Furthermore, why do you even bother trying to make this point when it's an impossibility (given current technology) in the first place? By the time we even have the capability to store antimatter in a useful quantity, we won't need it OR oil. We'll either be completely solar powered (There is no other energy source powerful enough [real or hypothetical] to facilitate a transition from Type I to Type II) or we'll be extinct.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Laize View Post
    A Dyson Sphere is a basically a hypothesized structure capable of harnessing a significant portion of the energy output of a star.

    Imagine hundreds or thousands of satellites arranged in a sphere with a star at the center, collecting solar energy and beaming it back to power stations for use by civilization.

    Basically a structure like this would be the foundation of a Type II civilization.

    We're a long way away from there. Like... in terms of energy output (as a civilization) we're about 18 orders of magnitude away.
    A Dyson sphere would be highly impractical because you'd have to keep moving that giant ass thing in its relative position to the star.

    I'm sure you know that, was just sayin.

  20. #20
    Not in any of our lifetimes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •