Doesent matter who is involved, chemical weapons are outlawed. If we dont do anything when they are used, make them legal again.
Doesent matter who is involved, chemical weapons are outlawed. If we dont do anything when they are used, make them legal again.
there's not even any guarantee that it was the regime that did it. after the iraq debacle, i take weapons of mass destruction excuses for intervention with a LARGE grain of salt.
http://www.mintpressnews.com/witness...eapons/168135/
i would, yeah. and, i'd stock them too, if i had charge of our armed forces.
and, in the event of an attack on our sovereign territory, such as the falklands, i would have no problem authorising their use. if i deemed it necessary, and beneficial to the war effort, i would use them on heavily populated areas, also.