Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ...
2
3
4
5
LastLast
  1. #61
    Over 9000! Hyve's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Great Britain
    Posts
    9,909
    I understand these sort of projects take time. As an aspiring game developer, I often side with Blizzard on many of their arguments, because I can see both sides of the fence, and often enough they're right.

    What is alarming though is the fact that they've said they're at a stable 25% with the models which gives the indication they won't be ready for the next expansion. I've no doubt Blizzard could pull it out of the bag if they wanted, but we've still yet to hear they're really committed to getting them done, as we're always told; "They're on the wishlist".

    I'm glad they're taking their time with this project, but 25% was alarming to me. I just hope they pull it off.

  2. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by Grubjuice View Post
    CONFIRMED!? Grey cube the next playable race!

    - - - Updated - - -



    Totally, Transmog was perhaps one of the greatest contribution to game aesthetic since they first expansion. Aesthetics matter.
    I couldnt agree more. Also, I'm sure they want to try and bring people back or possibly get new people in. I dont think that (mainly off of my own opinion) people will want to play a game that looks like its aged like wow does or even subscribe to it. Visual appeal means alot in games and wow is no different

  3. #63
    The Lightbringer OzoAndIndi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    3,492
    LOL!!

    Second pic clearly a meth addict. First pic was the reaction to her.

    The human... "My. Eyelids. WHERE HAVE THEY GONE."
    Last edited by OzoAndIndi; 2013-08-29 at 10:22 PM.

  4. #64
    Brewmaster Lazuli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Your Moms House
    Posts
    1,280
    I dunno, how fast are people expecting the next expansion? I think if they have 6+ months the models could be completed no problem.
    Quote Originally Posted by KungFuFanta
    Oh my god, a company tries to put some lore flavor into the game mechanics, all is lost, whatever shall we do without a whole 1% of crit or haste.

    Quick, call Ukraine and Russia, let them know to put their conflict on standby because Touch of Elune is BULLSHIT!

  5. #65
    Scarab Lord Arkenaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    4,390
    Yeah, I'm glad they're taking years working on some more mediocre new models like pandaren or god forbid: worgen.... The sad part is, I'm only half serious.

  6. #66
    25% has no context because we don't know when they started them. If they started them when they first brought it up at Blizzcon when they were showing off the pandas, that's one thing. But if they started a few months ago they can easily be ready for the next expansion.
    Quote Originally Posted by Extremity View Post
    I like turtles. I would like turtle-based tier sets. I would like a turtle shell helmet, and perhaps a cheeseburger backpack and a chestpiece that simply places a red gemstone on my bellybutton.

  7. #67
    The Patient Diogo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    317
    It looks like I'm the only one that doesn't really want new model updates. Is there any chance for Blizz to give us the option to maintain the character as it is, and not force us to change once they release the new stuff?

    I've been playing my Night Elf Warrior for almost 7 years and I still love him as much as I did back then, and I do not want him changed, at all.
    Misery loves company!

    ~ Mordekaiser

  8. #68
    Dreadlord soulyouth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    752
    Everyone lost there shit when this happened, no idea how or why.

    Look at the rogues face

  9. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by Diogo View Post
    It looks like I'm the only one that doesn't really want new model updates. Is there any chance for Blizz to give us the option to maintain the character as it is, and not force us to change once they release the new stuff?

    I've been playing my Night Elf Warrior for almost 7 years and I still love him as much as I did back then, and I do not want him changed, at all.
    I wouldn't get your hopes up. They did that with EQ. You could actually turn off and on individual new race models. However, I think it's blizzards style to want a consistency in how players view characters. I see them upgrading everything for everyone.
    Quote Originally Posted by Extremity View Post
    I like turtles. I would like turtle-based tier sets. I would like a turtle shell helmet, and perhaps a cheeseburger backpack and a chestpiece that simply places a red gemstone on my bellybutton.

  10. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by Diogo View Post
    It looks like I'm the only one that doesn't really want new model updates. Is there any chance for Blizz to give us the option to maintain the character as it is, and not force us to change once they release the new stuff?

    I've been playing my Night Elf Warrior for almost 7 years and I still love him as much as I did back then, and I do not want him changed, at all.

    Quote Originally Posted by @Evilyig
    @Ghostcrawler can u talk about possible reasons why u would not allow a choice between old and new player models?
    Originally Posted by Ghostcrawler
    @Evilyig We might. That would be a good way to reduce the "looks great but not my guy" factor.
    (posted at 4:36 PM - 17 Oct 12)

    So yes, they're certainly considering it.



    While I am sure there is not a way I can like the old models more than the updated ones, I still think the extra option being there is a good thing.



    So long as it doesn't hinder things like more armor geosets/3D gear.
    Quote Originally Posted by leaks View Post
    Well it's good to see the keyboard activists in full effect. Doing the laziest, most asinine thing they could think of off the top of their heads and calling it justice while making no difference.
    Quote Originally Posted by C9H20
    Blizzard effectively wants to have its cake and eat it too by pretending to have this groundbreaking war in a faction capital while at the same time being completely unwilling to portray logical consequences of such an event.

  11. #71
    Legendary! Tommo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    6,516
    Lets be honest, even the Pandas are low quality for a 2013 game. There has to be a line drawn between taking your time and taking forever.

  12. #72
    ROFL. Thanks op, so saving the last picture.

    I'd prefer them not to change the character models at all. But if they do it, please spare us the creepy eyes o_O

  13. #73
    I am Murloc! roahn the warlock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    In your base, killing your dudes
    Posts
    5,444
    Quote Originally Posted by Crookids View Post
    What worries me is that they said since Pandas were cross faction they were able to give them extra attention and quality.

    This makes me feel like 4 (6) races will be what? Not as detailed?
    whenever they say they did one thing, over another thing cause of quality or something... It's instantly bullshit in my eyes
    It was never Hardcore Vs Casual. It was Socialites Vs. Solo players
    Quote Originally Posted by ringpriest View Post
    World of Warcraft started life as a Computer Roleplaying Game, where part of the fun of the game experience was pretending to be your character. Stuff like applying poisons and eating food enhanced the verisimilitude of the experience of playing a fantasy character in another world. Now that game has changed to become a tactical arcade lobby game.

  14. #74
    Quote Originally Posted by Crookids View Post
    What worries me is that they said since Pandas were cross faction they were able to give them extra attention and quality.

    This makes me feel like 4 (6) races will be what? Not as detailed?
    They meant that because they only had to make one race for the expansion, they could spend more time developing that race.

  15. #75
    The Patient Diogo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by Yarathir View Post
    Originally Posted by Ghostcrawler
    @Evilyig We might. That would be a good way to reduce the "looks great but not my guy" factor.
    (posted at 4:36 PM - 17 Oct 12)

    So yes, they're certainly considering it.



    While I am sure there is not a way I can like the old models more than the updated ones, I still think the extra option being there is a good thing.



    So long as it doesn't hinder things like more armor geosets/3D gear.
    These might be good news indeed. I just hope I can maintain the looks on my character! I've been reading some posts and I've noticed Blizzard is probably really taking in consideration people like me, that got too ''affectionate'' with their character and just don't want them changed. Hopefully I won't be forced to change mine (at least radically I guess : / )
    Misery loves company!

    ~ Mordekaiser

  16. #76
    Quote Originally Posted by det View Post
    Hehe..if it is true what they say on the frontpage that people discussed EYEBLINKS for ages on the human model...no wonder they take their time.
    it wasn't a big deal, i don't even remember it being discussed. people have bitched about all the shoulder armor floating for a lot longer

    they have a shitty PR guy right now, that's why nobody has told blizz to just shut the hell up for a while

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Diogo View Post
    These might be good news indeed. I just hope I can maintain the looks on my character! I've been reading some posts and I've noticed Blizzard is probably really taking in consideration people like me, that got too ''affectionate'' with their character and just don't want them changed. Hopefully I won't be forced to change mine (at least radically I guess : / )
    well they can do like EQ did and give you an option. it's not something that is complicated to do.

  17. #77
    Pit Lord Radio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Straya Karnt
    Posts
    2,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Yarathir View Post
    If 25% in two-three years constitutes "taking their time", then I'm NOT glad that they're working at a pace where it'll take 6 more years to get all vanilla models and 2 extra years for the TBC ones.
    Working in software myself I can say that generally projects start fairly slow as you work on the design, make your first mistakes and truly get an understanding of the task and requirements.

    In the case of new character models, I'd expect the first 2-4 races to be the slowest by a mile, but as they get to the other races, the updates will push a lot faster as they've built up experience and can make better judgement calls on direction.

    I still won't expect these by 6.0 but I'd say we'd see something from Blizzard by then. If it's not out by 7.0 or one of the 6.X patches I'd be surprised.

  18. #78
    lol those gnomes were quite horrifying

  19. #79
    I am Murloc! Airwaves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia! G-day Mate!... (We don't really speak like that)
    Posts
    5,697
    This is far beyond "taking there time" at the rate they are going is going to take TEN YEARS for them to be done.
    Angels and Airwaves
    Aldmeri Dominion - Imperial - Templar - Laethys - High Elf - Assassin - Frostmourne - Orc - Rogue - Sea of Sorrows - Norn - Thief
    Borderlands 2 - Mechromancer - Battlefield 4 - Engineer - Diablo 3 - Wizard

  20. #80
    I'm glad it's taking a long time for character models too. Gives new MMOs (games that don't have Greg Street in charge) a VERY easy chance to surpass them. Keep up the retarded milking schedule Blizzard, see how far that gets you with a new MMO already released and 3 more on the way before the year is over. Keep being retarded. Please.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •