- - - Updated - - -
- - - Updated - - -
Ah you caught on that I was insulting him...+1 for you.
Dude has some decent ideas, too bad they are smothered by his bias and delusion.
Unless you actually believe that GC doesnt know the answer, and was actually looking for an answer from the community.
Yeah, GC didn't say that. You got the wrong guy.He also said that pandas and such would be regulated to comics and such, and well we know what happened there. The point is that Blizzard acts this was specifically to spur talk in the community. There has been nothing said that limits or blocks in Blizzard...by design.
cant these threads just end? its a terrible idea and its not going to happen. i want to punch a kitten every time i see this Teriz guy post about it.. i wish teriz would somehow be banned so there wouldnt need to be a million tinker threads all the time
Also, before you start re-quoting me all your "facts" for the millionth time, save everyone some time and realize you are taking basic facts and making unsupported leaps, to come to a phantom answer. We get it, you are a fan of an idea, you have opinions, and an inability to communicate things appropriately...not to mention a healthy dose of delusion mixed with a keg full of insecurity.
As for everything else, keep in mind that those tweets from GC regarding the Tinker completely support the points I made here;
Btw, if you don't wish to discuss the topic, don't respond to the topic.
For the record, here is Ghostcrawler's actual tweet (https://twitter.com/Ghostcrawler/sta...292543741952):
Not "Demon Hunters will never happen ever" or "There is too much overlap for demon hunters to happen" or anything else that Teriz claims Ghostcrawler said. And as it has been shown to him MANY TIMES now that Ghostcrawler did not say what Teriz claims he said, it can only be that Teriz is deliberately and with malice aforethought putting words into Ghostcrawler's mouth, and he won't stop until somebody forces him to do so.Originally Posted by Ghostcrawler
Also how does your idea of a WC3 based WoW Tinker class benefit from the comments, he pretty much said that the WC3 implementation is too whimsical for a class, and that a wholly different flavor of a tech class would need to be designed. In essence nullifying your initial idea.
The conclusion is that there isn't design space for a DH class.
My initial idea has always been a technology class in WoW. As long as its implemented, I really don't care what form it takes. I'm sure Blizzard will make it awesome regardless, just like the Monk class.Also how does your idea of a WC3 based WoW Tinker class benefit from the comments, he pretty much said that the WC3 implementation is too whimsical for a class, and that a wholly different flavor of a tech class would need to be designed. In essence nullifying your initial idea.
Last edited by mmines; 2013-09-03 at 12:51 AM.
I'm not saying Tinkers will be the next class....but I do put "Not sure" "Might be too whimsical" "Depends on how it is done" and "But maybe one of the designers will come up with a pitch perfect design that blows us away someday" in the same category of denial as (paraphrasing) "Usually when we do Pandaren, we do them in novels and comics".
As I said before - what if "someday" was last year? What if "Depends on how it was done" means they've already designed a non-silly version?
There's nothing specific there either for Tinkers or against. Either for a new class next Xpac or against.
At this point in time, I don't think theres much call for a new class. Given the diminishing returns, Blizzard might have enough "oomph" for one more as a major feature. The problem is what what would replace it...since the DR problems also affect the idea of a new race.You are too obsessed with the class. Don't set yourself up to be disappointed if somehow the new class is not tinker or there's not even a new class next xpac.
Last edited by Talen; 2013-09-03 at 01:43 AM.
No surprise that tinkers won that forum poll. Its a better concept when you think about it.