I don't care
if there is one id prefer one like dal where there are seperate areas and combined areas.
Yes, ad infinitum. It would be glorious...
Neutral cities were so cool because you get to see a lot more people in the city rather than your own faction, you can actually see people form the other faction, it gives it more of a bigger world feel, makes you feel like there's more people. Shattrath was my favorite and still is to this day, sometimes I'll go and chill there instead of Orgrimmar because it brings back memories. Neutral cities are badass.
Intel i5 3570k | MSI GTX 760 Twin Frozr | Corsair H80i | Asus z77 deluxe | Corsair Vengeance 8GB | Corsair CX600 | WD 1TB HDD | Samsung 256 840 Pro SSD
Success is 99 percent failure. -Soichiro Honda
<3 my DA9
I'd like a neutral city as long as it actually is a neutral city as opposed to an Alliance city that was converted to neutrality.
While Shattrath was no longer administered by the Draenei who eventually signed on with the Alliance, it was still more closely associated with the Alliance then the Horde. Dalaran was an even more extreme example, since it was a historically Alliance city that was opened to the Horde to deal with very specific current events. In Cataclysm Blizzard went straight back to treating Dalaran as Alliance-aligned, which created a whole bunch of continuity problems.
Rather ironically, were it not for the focus on war this expansion, the Pandaren would of been more the capable of providing a legitimately neutral city in MoP.
Without knowing what expansion 5 is, it's difficult to be sure what a truly neutral city would be. But all that really matters is that it doesn't have a significantly stronger connection to one faction over the other.
Roleplaying, hardcore Raiding, running LFR on the occasional weekend, PvPing, rolling alts, achievement hunting, pet battling, or just enacting an endless series of whims, I don't care how you play WoW. Just as long as you have fun doing it.
- - - Updated - - -
Neutral cities have the same problem as neutral heroes... if the Horde doesn't have an equivalent it turns out that the Alliance should share theirs.
I don't care if it's neutral or for both factions. I just want actual cities back, no more dinky houses with trade chat.
Unsubscribed 3/10/2014 - 8/14/2014.
Beware the claims of yearly expansions. It's not more hype more often, it's paying more for less. Fewer tiers, no more new levels, no more new races/classes, but an ever-increasing price tag....
Alliance player: Whose side were you on, Orc?
Well, that's easy.. All "Sanctuaries" used to belong the alliance races... Alliance were the ones that wants horde there in the first place.Who says they wouldn't kill you first for stinking up the air they're breathing with your horde miasma?
And if history teach us anything, will be most likely another alliance hub, wanting horde to join em once more... yuck, filthy pig skins..
I think both sides have good arguments.
On one hand we are suppose to hate each other, but on the other there are often more threatening matters, such as the Lich King.
Frankly I think as long as the story calls for it its fine. Like this xpac I'd say no we can't be neutral because well the whole thing is about the horde (and later garrosh's horde) exploiting resources from panda land.