Fair enough, although I'm not sure how Malfurion would know what Illidan is up to, with the Dark Portal being closed at the time and all. Still, it's not unbelievable that losing to Arthas would break Illidan, exactly as Malfurion says.
Then people would be voicing the same complaints they voiced about Arthas in WotLK. It's a fine line, one that Blizzard so far has not been able to manage.From that we can indeed see he thought he was the victor. He really was not the same Character, he was just labeled insane for the most part and it was a shame I wanted to see more of an anti hero or more truthfully just more of illidan have him showing up a bit more. (thats my real gripe)
That doesn't change the fact that he was feeding demon blood to orcs.As far as I knew Vasjh was still fairly loyal to illidan so will give you the points about Zangar marsh. Fel Orcs while brutal were signed in via Kargath who wanted to be stronger, so while Illidan gave them a source of power to do so he didnt force (most) of them to be fel orcs.
The main issue was him ordering his Blood elves to wipe out Shattrath for no real reason.Originally Posted by IllidanIt was absolutely in keeping with Illidan's character. The man was all about power and rationalizing his own selfish acts. It's a very short step from that to being a slaver, not to mention that the Naga likely would have encouraged it.As for the broken and enslaving them its not really in keeping with his personality from what we saw of wc3, it did happen but its just another point of his character was a fair bit different than what we remembered.