Originally Posted by
RedFlame
I'd rather not force our healer to apply sunders. the uptime will most likely be less that optimal, as we 2heal everything and hes usually busy healing.
- - - Updated - - -
.
specifically a personal dps loss to make him apply it, via the 25 energy and gcd every ~28 seconds, as expose armor does 0 damage in and of itself.
so, for the rogue alone, not applying the debuff is 248k dps for him, having the debuff applied by soemone else is 252k, and if HE has to use gcds and energy to apply it, he's at 250k.
the original issue being our rogue doesn't want to have to apply sunders, due to it being a personal dps loss, and puts forth switching a hunter from a spellhaste pet to a sunder pet, stating that it would be a net gain. i wanted proof to refute that claim, specifying that our lock would lose more from spellhaste than our rogue would gain from not having to apply expose armor.