everytime i see it the characters make my eyes bleed. its like they went halfway to realism and halfway to comic book and it DOES NOT look good, it just looks awkward and weird.
everytime i see it the characters make my eyes bleed. its like they went halfway to realism and halfway to comic book and it DOES NOT look good, it just looks awkward and weird.
"I was a normal baby for 30 seconds, then ninjas stole my mamma" - Deadpool
"so what do we do?" "well jack, you stand there and say 'gee rocket raccoon I'm so glad you brought that Unfeasibly large cannon with you..' and i go like this BRAKKA BRAKKA BRAKKA" - Rocket Raccoon
FC: 3437-3046-3552
Style is opinion, just like WoW's art. A lot of people love it, a lot think it looks "bad" because of it's Cartoony style.
Though, I did expect better for a new GTA tbh.
maybe they made it bad so the next-gen versions will look alot better and sell consoles/games
specifically the arms and necks look really weird to me.
"I was a normal baby for 30 seconds, then ninjas stole my mamma" - Deadpool
"so what do we do?" "well jack, you stand there and say 'gee rocket raccoon I'm so glad you brought that Unfeasibly large cannon with you..' and i go like this BRAKKA BRAKKA BRAKKA" - Rocket Raccoon
FC: 3437-3046-3552
The real question is, Why is GTA 5 online such a horrible game?
realistic looking game usually age badly, look at GTA vice city or max payne 1 or 2. Cartoon looking game, or cell shaded game usually age better.
GTA 5 run on the same hardware that GTA 4 was running, while rockstar may have learn to better use the hardware, they can do miracle.
I'm hoping the PC version will have have terrific graphics and effect. that won't change the artstyle, but perhaps the artstyle need a better technology to truly express its beauty. We'll see.
Art is subjective, just the same as your opinion.
I like the art style. <- also subjective.
Your thread should have posed the question, "Do you like the art style of GTA V?" Possibly even with a poll. This would be better for discussion, rather than us just analyzing your statement.
RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18
Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.
What? I spent hours praising the art design for GTA 5 the other day, lol.
Shhhh
Don't say anything bad about gta5 or the squad will come to get you.
I need glasses, I don't see this comic book look?
The character's artstyle is great and the world is incredibly rich.
It will be even better when on PS4 and PC.
GTA franchise has so much potential but they keep releasing the same game with outdated graphics (they did a better job this time though). I suppose it's only normal since it's like CoD, people like simple more of the same. I guess.
Only reason I enjoy Saints Row is because it was an exact copy of GTA but with extras like humor, original quests/missions. I won't buy Saints Row either if they release the same shit every time, which luckily they didn't as 4 showed.
Which is a fair argument if the gameplay is impressive. Which in this case it is not.
Also we live in 2013. Crysis was impressive when Crysis 1 was first released. With all the tech available in this age there simply shouldn't be any game released that looks remotely bad. This bullshit "gameplay > graphics" was a good argument 6 years ago. Games hardly look better then in 2011 now, they are just waaaay better optimised to run better for lower end PC's. Battlefield is a perfect example of that.
Not trying to praise Battlefield for it's gameplay here as I don't play as much myself, but the game can be played on high on almost every PC bought after 2010. I can count all games who can pull that off on a single hand.
Last edited by mmoc6f961e454e; 2013-10-07 at 09:06 PM.
Gameplay vs graphics is the most viable argument there ever will be.
A game should be rated firstly and foremost on how it plays. Everything else comes after. This has been a good argument since even the first physical games were created, never mind computer games. If a game is fun, people will play it, end of story. If it is not, but it looks amazing, people may be suckered in by the visuals then never play it.
As to why games hardly look better than 2011, it's because the majority of games have been designed around the Xbox 360/PS3's limited scopes. There's not much to be done about that until the next console gen kicks in in full next year onwards.
As to GTA 5's graphics, the game is extremely visually impressive for a multi-platform console game. Given the cripplingly small amount of RAM/VRAM that they have access to, it's about as good as it gets for a sandbox style game.
Its art style is completely subjective however. One person likes x, the other likes y and a 3rd likes z.
People like to express their opinions as rhetorical questions or conclusions, rather than open ended discussions, thus this thread's title: We're asked not whether or not we like the art style, but why it's so bad.
You are playing a ported low quality console version.
Wait for the real game which is the next gen console,s and then wait for the best version which is PC.
anyone else getting malicious URLS on this page ?
i do.
Avast warm me of a detected threat on this page.