And its not about me its about " Why bring a DK to a 10 man Group" so please keep to the subjekt.
Last edited by Lillnovan; 2013-11-16 at 12:32 AM.
Personally if I have to chose between a warrior, a DK, or a rogue, I'll take a warrior or a rogue first. That's assuming equal gear/skill/experience. But if I need attack speed, or find a good DK, I'll take the DK.
http://www.wow-heroes.com/character/...al/whitecloak/ LF guild
Dark#1458 for warrior help.
IT IS FRIEND NOT FIEND.
At least we win in the style-category. :P
"Vholu" in every game I play. You see a "Vholu" somewhere else, it's probably me!
If you're aiming for a nice rank in wowprogress you don't take a dk lol, our raid utility is poor (aoe deadgrip, chillblains sometimes and antimagic zone that can be replaced with any other class cd), considering our dps isn't enough and even that is behind the rest at some point, our mobility is quite bad. you can be a nice player that doesn't fail and gives average damage, but unfortunately if you want to push the progress at some point you can easily be replaced by almost every melee class, and better if replaced by a ranged. if you just want to clear content step by step (top 500 maybe?) dk's are just fine as any other class. Some times you can be also replaced just because you're a dk, and your raid leader doesn't have a valid excuse to give but it's a fight that becomes easier without a dk, again, because the other classes are better. ah, almost forgot, dk's have a combat ress, looooooooool