but he´s not talking about keeping that money, infact he´s talking about being heavily taxed and promotes it... so what´s your point? because he has money he can´t obviously have any idea about problems in the world? or that he therefore lacks empathy?
- - - Updated - - -
i do think he´s right, politicians get pardoned for everything, don´t really have to play by the rules and after elections have passed aren´t even standing by the principles they promoted to get elected in the first place
show me an employee that could do something like that and not be fired
Because he obviously NEVER dealt with them before in his life?
Because he obviously doesn't have friends or family who are dealing with those problems?
Was he born making $15 million?
And, as somebody said above, he was DEFENDING people who are impoverished... are you aiming what you just said here at ALL the corporate owners in the world as well?
I didn't realize substance abuse being fueled by a multimillion dollar entertainment career was something a lot of people did. Boy, I've missed out.
- - - Updated - - -
Sure is easy to be an activist and concerned about society when you're super wealthy.
Where was his concern in 2000? It was being injected into his arm. lol
Brand is an idiot. He's saying that the way to create a rule of the people is to remove democracy (lit. translation "Rule of the people") and replace with a model similar to that of the soviet union.
That's actually outright stupid.
It's true that the American voting system isn't working, and that is the First Past The Post system. The democratic process should be improved, not removed.
i don´t think that´s his entire message, more like that what we have now isn´t worth anything and doesn´t work the way it´s supposed (probably) to be
it´s not like that the problems he mentions are tackled, moreso that they aren´t and things get out of hand even more
look at the jp morgan settlement where they have to pay a "fine" of 13billion dollars, though thanks to the laws the "fine" is probably tax deductible
can it get anymore stupid?
- - - Updated - - -
but that´s not the point, now is it? or does his place in society change any of the points he made?
Maybe in your country. But not in mine. But what do I know? I'm just a socialist swed.
Though this guy has a point about how democracy and capitalism don't work at all in some cases. Given time, something else will spring up. But if I know people, such a change will take a very long time to happen. Because if there's something people don't like, it's change that brings them out of their comfort bubble.
I like his PoV more:
You cared enough to post.
He's basically advocating socialism or communism. Massive taxation of the rich and corporations? Rofl. Btw, he says that after he said that the Government should not ruin the economy. That would destroy the economy of the entire world.
This idea that everyone has an obligation to help people is absurd. I don't have to help you, you don't have to help me. The end.
P.S. If you want any of you ideas to be heard, you best vote. Unless you advocate armed revolution against an armed majority.
- - - Updated - - -
Capitalism is the best way to achieve freedom. Before you go and say, "NO SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM" I'll point out that socialism and communism usually lead to those in control of the Government becoming more powerful. It weakens the majority and strengthens the Government.
This is the funniest thing about people like Russell Brand. They talk about taxing themselves and making the Government more powerful, yet they wouldn't give the money that they think should be taxed to charities.
- - - Updated - - -
But that's not how it is in America. Americans vote for who they want to win, end of story. If the half of the country that doesn't vote because, "it doesn't matter" voted, you'd see that their ideas would be represented. But they're all apathetic, and therefore idiots.
As for there being other solutions to capitalism? Not really. What we have right now is a pretty good balance between liberty and stability. I mean if you really want to have a lot of stability you should try to move back to everything before the American Revolution.
Socialism weakens the minority and empowers the majority, every first-world nation in the world has socialistic elements. Capitalism provides freedom for the minority. But if you mix these two together, you get the kind of government that you'll find in any first-world nation.
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance