Page 67 of 99 FirstFirst ...
17
57
65
66
67
68
69
77
... LastLast
  1. #1321
    This guy was spot on lol at all the naysayers.
    http://www.drinkinganddriving.org/
    In honor of all the kids bringing up my avatar:
    Quote Originally Posted by obdigore View Post
    Wow, for someone with a trollface avatar, you are pretty bad at this.

  2. #1322
    Warchief miffy23's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Vienna
    Posts
    2,179
    Quote Originally Posted by Melkandor View Post
    This guy was spot on lol at all the naysayers.
    Still no confirmation, still nothing definite.
    Still just as bogus as before.
    Most sources I know say it's BS (former employees).

    <- still sticking with fake, no proof whatsoever, same hype as TDB

    FYI Mike Sacco already confirmed on Twitter that "The Dark Below" belonging to Titan is not true.
    I wonder what else is BS about this "leak" ^^
    Last edited by miffy23; 2013-11-02 at 12:19 AM.

  3. #1323
    Quote Originally Posted by miffy23 View Post
    Still no confirmation, still nothing definite.
    Still just as bogus as before.
    Most sources I know say it's BS (former employees).

    <- still sticking with fake, no proof whatsoever, same hype as TDB
    Well, if anyone would know what a company's current plans are, it would be the people who used to work for that company.

  4. #1324
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitei View Post
    People should settle down a bit.
    While the name is likely, that doesn't mean any of the other details are inherently correct.

    To begin with you have the glaring issue of "grom" being "renamed" to "grommash" that the original post mentions.
    Which clearly shows that the OP has no idea what he's talking about, since Grommash is already his name, and since he's been named Grom/Grommash for 15+ years, and since Deathwing wasn't renamed despite the existence of several other things already named "Deathwing".

    I honestly have a hard time believing that Blizzard is foolish enough to focus a third expansion in a row on Orcs, alienating the Alliance player-base yet again--and making an expansion where Garrosh 0.5 is the antagonist.
    "Op didnt read every lore book, so the conversation he heard of which the title has allready been confirmed must be bullshit because fucklogic."

    Oh right.

  5. #1325
    The Insane det's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The forums
    Posts
    17,623
    Quote Originally Posted by miffy23 View Post
    Why close it when people are just speculating? Go back a few pages and you can read the mod statement on why not.
    ...and suddenly it is hot....
    Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
    One cause is a cognitive bias called projection bias. Essentially living inside your own head your entire life makes it exceedingly difficult to understand how others do not also live your same life, think your same thoughts, and hold your same beliefs. In many cases it's quite frustrating to try to empathize and understand why you yourself may not be the center of the universe, which generally results in one 'acting out' in various ways.
    So, in short: the internet.

  6. #1326
    Quote Originally Posted by miffy23 View Post
    Still no confirmation, still nothing definite.
    Still just as bogus as before.
    Most sources I know say it's BS (former employees).

    <- still sticking with fake, no proof whatsoever, same hype as TDB
    exactly how is it that former blizzard employees are any kind of a viable source?

  7. #1327
    The Insane det's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The forums
    Posts
    17,623
    Quote Originally Posted by Biged781 View Post
    Holy crap this guy had the right name.
    ..unless Blizzard is trolling us

    Yes, i am willing to eat my words. Warlord of Draenor still doesn't "feel right"
    Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
    One cause is a cognitive bias called projection bias. Essentially living inside your own head your entire life makes it exceedingly difficult to understand how others do not also live your same life, think your same thoughts, and hold your same beliefs. In many cases it's quite frustrating to try to empathize and understand why you yourself may not be the center of the universe, which generally results in one 'acting out' in various ways.
    So, in short: the internet.

  8. #1328
    Okay, so I understand that nothing has been officially confirmed yet and all but the name seems pretty legit all things considered. I will be very happy with pretty much any story so long as it doesn't involve us going back in time to kill Grom Hellscream or pretty much anything to do with Garrosh. Fuck Garrosh, they need to wrap his story up with a pretty bow in 5.5 and behead him or something fitting, not drag it out into a new expansion. It would have been a cool ending to MoP, but for the love of god I really hope they don't focus an entire expansion around the last baddies daddy. Blizzard could pull it off and it would still be pretty cool, but thinking about it still gives me this feeling of unease.

    Needless to say non of the story or anything has been confirmed yet, so this is all rampant speculation. I guess time will tell.

  9. #1329
    Quote Originally Posted by Shiift View Post
    "Op didnt read every lore book, so the conversation he heard of which the title has allready been confirmed must be bullshit because fucklogic."

    Oh right.
    It was more of a "OP mentions a "new" naming convention which is really an old one, and talks about a legal case that clearly doesn't actually exist."

    It's also fundamentally flawed logic to assume that all parts of something a true because one is.
    Were you not around for all of the "leaks" that said Mists of Pandaria was a south seas expansion with Zandalar and Kul Tiras?
    You tried too hard and now your post is shit. Never try too hard, the gamble isn't worth it. -Boubouille

  10. #1330
    Dreadlord Black Kyurem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Belfast, Ireland
    Posts
    894
    Quote Originally Posted by miffy23 View Post
    Still no confirmation, still nothing definite.
    Still just as bogus as before.
    Most sources I know say it's BS (former employees).

    <- still sticking with fake, no proof whatsoever, same hype as TDB

    FYI Mike Sacco already confirmed on Twitter that "The Dark Below" belonging to Titan is not true.
    I wonder what else is BS about this "leak" ^^
    Boub has never been wrong.
    Quote Originally Posted by Valerean View Post
    I admire your passion for your favorite character, but If I were you I'd hesitate before drawing parallels between self-perceived societal malaise and how nerds feel about a fictional blob of green pixels created in 2001 by a guy called Chris.

  11. #1331
    Quote Originally Posted by det View Post
    ..unless Blizzard is trolling us

    Yes, i am willing to eat my words. Warlord of Draenor still doesn't "feel right"
    I have said those same exact words every time we hear about a trademark, and i have been wrong every time. I will tell you what everyone told me when I refused to believe MOP was a facebook game....."Warlords of Draenor IS the next expansion, accept it"

  12. #1332
    Take notice who OP's post was edited by. Something is odd!

  13. #1333
    Warchief miffy23's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Vienna
    Posts
    2,179
    Quote Originally Posted by xerxo View Post
    exactly how is it that former blizzard employees are any kind of a viable source?
    Plans may change, but none of them feel that this is the actual expansion.
    I'm HEAVILY leaning towards this being a Hearthstone expac, Warcraft IV or something else IF it turns out to be a legit TM.
    You know what the beauty of this troll is? Nobody can claim it's true or false until after Blizzcon. And if it's a real TM but not the expansion then no official statement will confirm or deny it either. So there you have your little dilemma.

  14. #1334
    Meh, I'm still wary about this whole thing.

    Ok I'm willing to concede this is a real trademark, but it doesn't necesarily means its related to wow, after all, Heroes of the Storm turned out to be something else entirely.

    Also look at this bit in the trademark description:

    downloadable electronic game software for use on portable electronic devices such as mobile and cellular phones, laptops, handheld computers, and tablet PCs.
    As far as I know, wow is not playable in tablets, let alone cell phones. Me thinks this is more related to Hearthstone than wow.

    Por que odiar si amar es mas dulce? (*^_^*)

  15. #1335
    I am Murloc! The Glitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Litwak's Arcade Sunny Scotland!
    Posts
    5,972
    Quote Originally Posted by Goremonger View Post
    Take notice who OP's post was edited by. Something is odd!
    The Op posted peoples real life names, Boub removed them, as naming people here on the forums is against the rules.

  16. #1336
    Quote Originally Posted by Gospels View Post
    lol right its OUR fault cause this was the ONLY "I work for Blizz" post out there, how dare we call B.S. lollol
    Thank you

  17. #1337
    Warchief miffy23's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Vienna
    Posts
    2,179
    Quote Originally Posted by Derah View Post
    Meh, I'm still wary about this whole thing.

    Ok I'm willing to concede this is a real trademark, but it doesn't necesarily means its related to wow, after all, Heroes of the Storm turned out to be something else entirely.

    Also look at this bit in the trademark description:



    As far as I know, wow is not playable in tablets, let alone cell phones. Me thinks this is more related to Hearthstone than wow.
    Another heavy indication for Hearthstone content.

  18. #1338
    Alright complete speculation time.....

    If time travel is in fact a huge factor in the expansion will we be going back to level 60 at the start of the content? This could fix the item squish problems. I am sure people would be outraged at this, but I wonder if it's possible.

    I also believe we are going to get Etherals and Ogre as playable races and possibly demon hunters....

    Also with timetravel being possible, does this mean Arthas is still around? Incoming Arthas as X6 baddie again? X3 was merely a setback....

  19. #1339
    Isn't life going to be dull next week at this time, when we all know for sure one way or the other?

  20. #1340
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitei View Post
    People should settle down a bit.
    While the name is likely, that doesn't mean any of the other details are inherently correct.

    To begin with you have the glaring issue of "grom" being "renamed" to "grommash" that the original post mentions.
    Which clearly shows that the OP has no idea what he's talking about, since Grommash is already his name, and since he's been named Grom/Grommash for 15+ years, and since Deathwing wasn't renamed despite the existence of several other things already named "Deathwing".

    I honestly have a hard time believing that Blizzard is foolish enough to focus a third expansion in a row on Orcs, alienating the Alliance player-base yet again--and making an expansion where Garrosh 0.5 is the antagonist.
    Something tells me some of his message was lost in translation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •