Do you agree with this image?

[Deleted]

Again, rose tinted glasses strike again. Who even makes these pictures, people who run LFR and 2s all the time?

[Willas]

Not even close. Rose coloured glasses.

[militaryspartan]

Yeah….no.


Class design from vanilla - bc was shit. Paladin, druid = healing. No dps, no tanking. Warrior = tank. What you want to come to Sunwell? Dude you're a feral druid, no!

PvP in vanilla? Seriously? It came from the community, not the pvp. PvP was horrible.

Music, art, story, and setting in Cata was complete shit. Nothing made sense, the villains were crap, and nobody cared about anything.

[Lochton]

Nope, can't agree on that picture at all.

[Deleted]

No PVP, because I don't feel competent judging it, never got serious with it.

[Saphyron]

I highly disagree with a lot in that picture.

[Marxman]

Tell me again how Vanilla and BC had a good story. Please. The expansion with the most artistic detail was Cata, surprisingly enough. I'd be prone to agree with the original image lol.

Wasn't really the story, it was the world and art design. The story was non-existent in vanilla and very sparse and jumbled in BC. It was the world that made vanilla so great.

[Deleted]

Fixed it for you

[Gheld]

Swap TBC with MoP, and WoTLK with Vanilla and I would completely agree

EDIT: Also I'm sorry but TBC had no community. If you were part of the "in crowd" yeah, sure... but if you weren't a part of the in crowd all you could do was run around gathering peacebloom and running battlegrounds.

[bufferunderrun]

looking at the class design score of vanilla in those pictures made me smile irl; clearly those are based on forum rose tinted glass opinions.

[Thorio]

MOP was void and farce. But I'm glad it served a purpose of taking a trash dev out.

[Deleted]

Heck no. MoP was better in almost every way compared to the previous expansions, imo. The only thing I can agree with is the decline of server communities.

[Seefer]

Heck no. MoP was better in almost every way compared to the previous expansions, imo. The only thing I can agree with is the decline of server communities.

In my personal opinion the raids were better in BC and the story was better in WOTLK than MoP and Crapaclysm.

[Pum]

Well i agree with what u say, i just meant the baseline story of the Horde and the alliance discovering a hidden land in the mists filled with pandabears doesnt really appeal to me

You haven't played this expansion one single bit have you?

OT: Yeah don't agree with pretty much most of it, and the creator of this chart didn't play Vanilla/TBC at all.

[The Jester]

Some of them yes, ...others...well...

Vanilla didn't have the storytelling of WOTLK.

[Iseeyou]

http://i.imgur.com/JYJM9LS.jpg (big pic)

a fan's take on the state of the key aspects of the game from then til now. Would you say its accurate?

Dunno who did this.

But that image is pretty accurate.

[hrugner]

This lines up with my impression of the game.

[Deleted]

Nope. In Cataclysm they added Rated BG's and returned pvp titles which i think is huge.

[TJ]

Nope, probably one of the most biased images I've ever seen. Clearly a Vanilla/TBC were the best point of view where nostalgia completely takes over. Don't get me wrong, the community and stuff I will agree with, but class design and raids better? Yeah right.

[Conscious]

http://i.imgur.com/JYJM9LS.jpg (big pic)

a fan's take on the state of the key aspects of the game from then til now. Would you say its accurate?

I'd say Wrath is a little off, and needs to have more points in the PVE areas, however for Mists and Cataclysm especially I think it's accurate.