No, it hasn't been debunked. And that's kinda like saying "Well since Ive slept around a lot and haven't got an STD, anyone else who sleeps around a lot wont get one either".
It also comes down to parental choice and at what line that begins and ends. Its been happening for thousands of years..and now suddenly..in Denmark..its a bad thing? Was there some large rash of complaints? Did some babies die or something? Or is this just a lobby group with too much time on their hands and realizing the "blame everything on the arabs" bandwagon sailed and needed something to fill the time? What about the Jews in Denmark? This is going to create a much bigger shitstorm then I think anyone realizes
Its DENMARK. Its a ban in denmark, not the jungle. Denmark!. There is ZERO benefits of none medical circumstition. Therefor its MUTILATION and should be banned by LAW.
And so it should be in every developed country. But as its seen, some western countries arent as developed as they think.
*wink wink*
Good.
Removing perfectly healthy and viable tissue for no other reason than "It looks better that way" or "My daddy before me had his cut" makes no sense, the option will still be on the table in medical applications where merit is shown in removing the foreskin due to a condition.
But my large issue with it is the lack of consent from the party having their body mutilated.
Not seeing, from the article, where the suggestion of an actual ban's coming, other than a Doctor's organisation suggesting it. No political commentary or anything. Also don't really understand the need to draw Denmark into a comparison with Israel, especially when the Danish side of the story is told in what amounts to 1/10th of the article.
Yeah thats how it goes with progress. People realized mutilating babies to appease an invisible man in the clouds is a bad thing and moved on. Just like they moved on from mutilating vaginas, burning witches, dancing naked around the fire while engaging in human sacrifice, etc etc.
So the men of Denmark will now be sporting turtlenecks.....wow.
Circumcision: because genital mutilation of babies is fun.
.......
Hah....
Oh my.
Yes my simple friend. They did. Death via castration. So your boogie man in the sky can be appeased.
What a great way to welcome new life into this world, death via castration to appease the gods. Do you know about google?
Don't bash or bring up religion
Yeah that's the crux of it I think. I had mine done when I was 19, and it was a really empowering experience, but only because it was a choice that I made. Once you take the choice away it becomes something completely different. But I also understand why people get defensive, you are by extension attacking their bodies (and a part of the bodies that they had no control over, in many cases), so I think a "hey what's wrong with it!" from either side is an understandable response.
I'm glad I got circumcised I did not want all that extra skin, my johnsons with a turtleneck hell no.
Like most men in the world. Only USA and jews love genital mutilation so much. I feel sorry for all the men that never felt the thousands of nerve ending pleasure this little piece of skin can offer. And all who tell that "for hygiena" it's like saying "we should remove all teeth to prevent tooth decay". How about cleaning your shit every day? You brush your teeth every day, so roll your turtleneck back in the shower and clean Mr. Willy. That's all it takes.
Last edited by Kryos; 2014-01-24 at 03:20 PM.
Atoms are liars, they make up everything!