I've never really felt like having a biological child was a big deal. Adopted or biological, they'd still be my child.
I've never really felt like having a biological child was a big deal. Adopted or biological, they'd still be my child.
My thoughts are that this is one of the most ridiculous, stupid topics I've ever seen on this board.
Who the hell are you to tell anyone besides yourself that its wrong of them to have children? Or dictate how many they can have before they cause a problem?
Wow, I'm legitimately in awe of how much ignorance you packed into so few words.
Most ethical systems are designed around inbuilt human desires. It's our way of rationalising them. So I find the title kind of oxymoronic.
IMO either you build an ethical system in which the desire to reproduce is axiomatically "good" or you just reject ethical systems entirely.
My friends just started fostering a couple of kids. I think it's pretty awesome and the kids are cool when I have been around. A history I would not wish on anyone else, but very loving and well behaved, at least around other people. That comment about 'scumbags' is pretty messed up... Their past should be an additional kick of empathy, not a condemnation of the kids...
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
I think having kids is unethical if you are an Anti-abortion person. Only because they are against fetuses being "killed" and want it to grow into a kid and have a life yet they don't want to help out with it once its popped out. Why have a kid if there's one you can raise that you voiced your opinion over so loudly?
I wouldn't be opposed to adopting myself.
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
Sounds like the way I was thinking when I was 15 and naive. The cost of adoption alone excludes many people.
Uhm, why would I want someone else's kid?
Not exactly my fault those uncivilised ''people'' pop out 20 kids even though they can barely support 1.
I'm biologically broken, so I would kind of have to adopt. (Can't afford it, however, so I guess it's for the best.)
Aside from that, there have been too many stories of pregnant women dropping dead or suffering from medical malpractice, in the past five years, for me to want to take that risk.
Also, I have enough issues that I would not want to pass on to the next generation. Hubby is amazing, and I think his genes should continue on...he'll just have to find a girlfriend to accomplish that, though.
- - - Updated - - -
Not the child's fault. Without a good role model, that child would be fated to just repeat the cycle. Or do you approve of systematically killing of the kids created from these irresponsible individuals?
My wife and I are not planning on having children.
I do not hold it against a responsible couple if they have the desire to raise a child or two. Part of me does feel like people who have large families are being selfish.
I prefer a child who's an extension of myself, raising a child, specially a biological one, is very much a selfish act... you want YOUR genes to continue, you want to nurture that child, who carries your genes to succeed, to be happy, to reflect upon you as-well.
I'm not sure wether I'll ever want to have children, but if I will, I'd want to be their 1.0 version... I don't care much for the children of others.
What's with all the "Is X unethical" silly questions all of a sudden?
Must be a slow news week for Off-Topic to become THIS bored.