So on one hand economic progressives often say company X "exploits" its workers, because the big guys upstairs earn 400 times more than the usual employee and therefore we should have "more income equality" or "more wealth equality" (even though they're not the same thing).
But... on the other hand the "solution" proposed is often something along the lines of "let's tax those big guys upstairs by 50-90% and give the money to everyone else in society (although we still decide how it's spent since we're the "progressive" elite and we know best).
Does that make any sense? Nope.
And also for those saying that workers aren't payed enough or should somehow share in the profit... I take it you have no problem with them also sharing losses even if it means they go for long periods with nothing but debt? Right? Didn't think so.