View Poll Results: How would you Like to see Demon Hunters Implemented (please read OP before voting)

Voters
169. You may not vote on this poll
  • New Class

    106 62.72%
  • Alternative Playstyle for Demonology Warlocks

    33 19.53%
  • Alternative Aesthetics for Rogues

    17 10.06%
  • Alternative Playstyle for Warlocks AND Alternative Aesthetics for Rogues

    13 7.69%
Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ...
8
9
10
  1. #181
    Quote Originally Posted by Thimagryn View Post
    The RPG books aren't canon. It's why none of us on either side of the argument are sourcing them, and being careful to source official information. Even WoWiki and Wowpedia are not 100% credible sources. We are sourcing descriptions from Warcraft 3 and WoW, and official sources such as their Webpage, Official Guides or Novels.

    http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/to...1372142?page=1
    So, what about the stuff that's in both the rpg books and the games, does that make them non-canon with in a canon?

    Paradox.

    Everyone who's ever had this discussion has full well known they just blanket statemented it as non canon for the sake of not having to go through every single little line and relay whether it's canon or not.

    That argument is bad and doesn't prove anything. If it were a stupid third party fan fiction book made on some person's blog, I'd agree.

  2. #182
    Quote Originally Posted by Stormtrooperz View Post
    So, what about the stuff that's in both the rpg books and the games, does that make them non-canon with in a canon?

    Paradox.

    Everyone who's ever had this discussion has full well known they just blanket statemented it as non canon for the sake of not having to go through every single little line and relay whether it's canon or not.

    That argument is bad and doesn't prove anything. If it were a stupid third party fan fiction book made on some person's blog, I'd agree.
    That's pretty much what the RPG books were. While there is a lot of overlap into WoW, there is a lot of information that is wildly off as well. Take all of the Pandaren information in the RPG books for example, they talk about Shadopan wariors, but they are not the same as the ones found in MoP. There are also talks of Geomancers and Pikemen, who don't appear anywhere in the games. There's even massive overlap with Dungeons and Dragons lore, like Goblins using Phlogiston as a main fuel source.

    For all intents and purposes, the rpg books are deemed non-canon. Period.

    No one is interested in debating fan fiction, so we try to keep references to RPG books minimal to none. Of course, it's not 100% avoidable since you'll have new people jumping into the middle of the conversation and bring up a quote from APG now and again, or making assumptions based on what they read on WoWWiki (Demon Hunters being any class) and believe it to be true because it's on the Wiki.

    Just get it in your head before someone else has to tell you the same thing.
    Last edited by Thimagryn; 2014-02-13 at 04:26 AM.

  3. #183
    Quote Originally Posted by Stormtrooperz View Post
    So, what about the stuff that's in both the rpg books and the games, does that make them non-canon with in a canon?

    Paradox.
    What's in the game is canon. Whats in the novels is canon. What is the comics is canon - in the case of Me'dan, unfortunately so.

    What's in the RPG is not. It used to be.
    It isn't now

    Everyone who's ever had this discussion has full well known they just blanket statemented it as non canon for the sake of not having to go through every single little line and relay whether it's canon or not.
    Yes. And also to keep the amount of material at a reasonable level. The RPG was always a bit quirky.

    EJL

  4. #184
    Dreadlord Zenny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    802
    Quote Originally Posted by Stormtrooperz View Post
    So, what about the stuff that's in both the rpg books and the games, does that make them non-canon with in a canon?

    Paradox.

    Everyone who's ever had this discussion has full well known they just blanket statemented it as non canon for the sake of not having to go through every single little line and relay whether it's canon or not.

    That argument is bad and doesn't prove anything. If it were a stupid third party fan fiction book made on some person's blog, I'd agree.
    No, anything in the books and game would be canon, as it is in the game. Anything that is exclusive to the RPG books is non-canon as stated by Blizzard themselves. No paradox at all.

    The RPG books have as much validity as a "stupid third party fan fiction book made on some person's blog".

  5. #185
    The Lightbringer judgementofantonidas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    East Coast USA
    Posts
    3,509
    i would like to see them implemented............NOT.





    There is no bad RNG only bad L2P

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •