Poll: Should Blizzard have kept quiet about Garrosh?

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst
1
2
3
  1. #41
    New Kid Zaelsino's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    14,906
    It did kill the suspense a bit, but everyone would've seen it coming anyway by 5.1, if Tides of War didn't make it obvious enough already.

    It was just swapping out one debate for another really; the new Warchief speculation was enjoyable enough. And even then, Gary still has a bunch of people who think he did nothing wrong and wanted to join his side in 5.4.

  2. #42
    Elemental Lord Sierra85's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    getting a coffee
    Posts
    8,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Tilde View Post
    if you can't predict the story in advance you should probably be put out of your misery.
    wow, really? lol... people deserve death for not predicting the story. Harsh much?
    Hi

  3. #43
    Mechagnome intrinsc's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
    Posts
    538
    I don't think it was a "bad" idea per-say, but it wasn't the best idea, in my opinion. It's okay to know the beginning and the end of a story, and play or read to find out the middle. But, I think it would have floored us a lot more to find out the end after knowing how the expansion started. I think this expansion had great storytelling, something I hope they keep going in Warlords, but I also hope they keep the ending to themselves.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •