View Poll Results: Should Blizzard have kept quiet about Garrosh?

Voters
105. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes - I would've liked to have found out playing the expansion

    80 76.19%
  • No - with no major bad guys at launch, I wouldn't have stayed

    13 12.38%
  • Garrosh is a bad guy? When did that happen?

    12 11.43%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst
1
2
3
  1. #41
    New Kid Zaelsino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    13,266
    It did kill the suspense a bit, but everyone would've seen it coming anyway by 5.1, if Tides of War didn't make it obvious enough already.

    It was just swapping out one debate for another really; the new Warchief speculation was enjoyable enough. And even then, Gary still has a bunch of people who think he did nothing wrong and wanted to join his side in 5.4.

  2. #42
    Scarab Lord Mokoshne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    getting a coffee
    Posts
    4,482
    Quote Originally Posted by Tilde View Post
    if you can't predict the story in advance you should probably be put out of your misery.
    wow, really? lol... people deserve death for not predicting the story. Harsh much?
    My weekly podcast can be downloaded here this week we discuss Bill Cosby

  3. #43
    Stood in the Fire intrinsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    438
    I don't think it was a "bad" idea per-say, but it wasn't the best idea, in my opinion. It's okay to know the beginning and the end of a story, and play or read to find out the middle. But, I think it would have floored us a lot more to find out the end after knowing how the expansion started. I think this expansion had great storytelling, something I hope they keep going in Warlords, but I also hope they keep the ending to themselves.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •