Thread: Arms RBG FC?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst
1
2
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by ipoststuff View Post
    They still take way more damage than arms.
    ...
    They don't. That's why they are used over arms.

  2. #22
    Sorry but only a Druid can FC in any serious RBG over 1650-1700.

    You can FC for Yolo RBG's just to hit your cap, but no good team will ever take an arms warrior for an FC. I don't like it, but that's how it is. Ironic how Blizz put the 50% tank debuff so that RBG's groups wouldn't have to be forced to find a tank, but now all it did was force players to use a Druid.

    Quote Originally Posted by ipoststuff View Post
    They still take way more damage than arms.
    Umm, no. Druids are the only viable FC for RBG's at the moment if you're trying to gain rating.
    Last edited by Chingylol; 2014-03-07 at 05:42 PM.

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Knolan View Post
    - More armor and damage reduction than a feral in bear form.
    - More HP than a feral in bear form.
    - Reduced barkskin cd.
    - Reduced magic damage taken.
    - 3s silence on 15s CD.
    - Dk symb.
    It seems i oversaw the "thick hide" talent. and leather specialization grants +5% stamina.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •