Unsubbed"Haste will fix it" - GhostcrawlerElectrical Engineering Student
This thread is hilarious. If you want to act like a cutting edge progression raider you are half a year late. Play what you want and stop making my eyes hurt with those incorrect statistics.
Arcane is great and probably the highest dps spec...Until you need to move
You do know that your wpn gem is with expertise right?!?!?!?!?
I've made some pretty interesting discoveries recently by testing each spec, be aware though that your results may vary:
As you can see, fire is currently the highest sex per hr spec. Whilst playing fire I had a threesome with two twins and then later, with their mother.
Where are your error bars, what do they represent? What statistical test are you applying to the data? Where did you get your data from, did your normalize it? What did you normalize it to?
Where did you get your data from? I want to see it.
You just posted some bars. Those are useless and it's laughable that you think a bar graph is "mathematical data"
BTW: Using a large data set removes that RNG. That's why you use large data sets. The RNG outliers effect the true value less when they are a small portion of the population. Basic stat tests take this into account.
Last edited by Frost1129; 2014-03-08 at 08:11 PM.
Closing this thread. It just went straight to hell and weren't here to catch it then.. Better late than never I suppose