View Poll Results: Which class would you like to see as the next class in WoW?

Voters
582. You may not vote on this poll
  • Demon Hunter

    218 37.46%
  • Tinker

    157 26.98%
  • Bard

    92 15.81%
  • Necromancer/Acolyte/Necrolyte

    71 12.20%
  • Archmage/Battlemage

    52 8.93%
  • Blademaster/Gladiator

    29 4.98%
  • Dragonsworn

    77 13.23%
  • Ranger/Sentinel/Scout/Dark ranger

    80 13.75%
  • Spellbreaker

    63 10.82%
  • Spiritwalker

    17 2.92%
  • Technomage

    22 3.78%
  • Templar

    27 4.64%
  • Titanborn

    57 9.79%
  • Warden

    52 8.93%
  • Witch Doctor

    41 7.04%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ...
2
3
4
5
6
... LastLast
  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by Teyek View Post
    A class I thought of.. completely out of left field.. Chromatic Dragon. Lore-wise you were created by Nefarion or Deathwing (whatever) but in their absence must find your own path in life. Like all dragons you can (and often do) use humanoid form (this can be your race/faction selection) with learning dragonform as a (flying) mount later on (maybe an ability to use it in battle also). Specs can be tank (Earthwarder), heals (Lifebinder), caster DPS (Arcane) with Time-use and Dream-use as utility spells for all specs. Mail armour would be appropriate as many mail leatherworking items use dragon scales. Only thing with this is I think it would be just a mix of current classes and the only uniqueness is the idea they are dragons.
    Just a thought
    Honestly, I really like the sound of this. When I RP my Druid, I use my Vial of the Sands and give the impression my character is Druidic Dragonsworn. I would absolutely play this class, and the fact that it fits into the Mail armor, and can use INT Mail fills that void as well. Nice job!
    “Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward,
    for there you have been, and there you will always long to return.” Leonardo da Vinci

  2. #62
    Brewmaster Constraint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    1,275
    Quote Originally Posted by Superman-BladesEdge View Post
    Of course they would need to be Duskwood sized, and not Blade's Edge size.
    I see what you did there.

    For me, I'd love Bards to make it into WoW. Easily my favorite class in certain other games, such as DAoC. I don't really see them fitting into WoWs current design of "Every DPS class must bring similar utility, put out similar DPS and make use of a similarly easy rotation", and "Every healer must put out similar HPS, have similar raid CDs, and have a similar arsenal of heals". Especially since Bards have historically been a buffing/support class, which I've LOVED in every game I've ever used them in. Curse you for removing them from WoW, Blizzard!

  3. #63
    Scarab Lord Zka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    hungary
    Posts
    4,307
    Anything but Demon Hunter

    Retired raider coming back for WoD.
    WoD BETA CLUB

  4. #64
    Quote Originally Posted by Ondray View Post
    Yes i want Archmage, because its completelly new class....
    archmage is a mage that is a master of all 3 specs of a mage arcane, frost, fire.
    there is not really anything different except a few spells.

  5. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    I was merely relaying an informed statement for the less informed among us who actually believe half of those options have any chance of appearing.
    Well the name of the class is the core concept. Even you have said that names can be changed, like the Tinker, who could be called anything from Artificer to Mechanic.

    All classes could be given new names. Even Brewmaster isn't a class, we got 'Monk' instead. Demon Hunters, Dark Rangers, Battle/TechnoMages could all be specs of broader archetypes. The name isn't important as long as the core concept is retained.

  6. #66
    I want to play a supporter class (e.g. bard)

  7. #67
    Can't vote, nothing close to my suggestion. Boycott Polls!
    Praise the Quest Writers for they give life to otherwise boring expansions.
    I was wrong about Blizzcon 2014 having nothing interesting to show off: There's a Robot Monk!

  8. #68
    Voted Bard because its most classic, yet still interesting.

    Hate all modern spider-man demon hunters and sh1t

  9. #69
    The Patient Isoge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    291
    I would much rather have an alliance-exclusive mid-range close-range sword wielding CQC-mastering spell-casting bow-man with a twist: he is an alliance-turning-horde guy in mid-game (he hates gnomes)

    But since this class is not an option (I call this class the amidoinitriteguis, and you can only choose night elves as his race: night elf amidoinitriteguis) i have no choice but to choose the demon hunter because they're awesome.

  10. #70
    I voted Tinker and Technomage. I'd like to see a Bard at some point, but not next. An Alchemist/Apothecary class as well, would attract my interest, but it's not on the list. The rest, I have no interest in. Some, I have less than no interest in. Lookin' at you, demon hunter.
    Last edited by Drilnos; 2014-03-06 at 11:49 PM.

  11. #71
    The Lightbringer Zoaric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The United States of America, Rapture, or Orgrimmar
    Posts
    3,636
    Is mayonnaise a class?

    Honestly though, I kind of want Horde to get one class and Alliance get another.
    Despite it being impractical and nigh impossible to balance...
    Last edited by Zoaric; 2014-03-06 at 11:50 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yvaelle View Post
    You can't fight porn on the internet, you may as well declare war on something overwhelming like water on Earth's surface - or something ephemeral like "terror" (lol sorry, had to do it) - or something both overwhelming and ephemeral... like porn on the internet.

  12. #72
    Moderator Gehco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    FEEL THE WRATH OF MY SPANNER!!
    Posts
    7,541
    My note for this,

    I really, really don't want Demon Hunter. Heck, you can get a Demon Acolyte, a failed Demon Hunter - but players shouldn't be actual Demon Hunters.

    Rather pointing to Tinker (Personal favorite), Templar (Another grand favorite), Bard (A fun, and would like to see concept, if Blizzard added support classes).

    Honestly, most those class choices are just buffed up of some other class. The only ones with a special concept is Tinker, Technomage. I don't know what a Titanborn is. And Demon Hunter is on a page of complete other subject. Unlike the Death Knight, who we raised for an army, Demon Hunters are few in general. High fail rate at training and would be considered a foe rather than a friend.
    If you disapprove of moderation, seek an Admin or Global Moderator.
    Stuff can be fixed, just get enough glue or duct tape!
    R.I.P Project 'Titan' - My curious mind will still think of you!

  13. #73
    The only thing that I can see vaguely be a real class is the spellbreaker.

  14. #74
    Bloodsail Admiral
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,120
    Demonhunters.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Gehco View Post
    My note for this,

    I really, really don't want Demon Hunter. Heck, you can get a Demon Acolyte, a failed Demon Hunter - but players shouldn't be actual Demon Hunters.

    Rather pointing to Tinker (Personal favorite), Templar (Another grand favorite), Bard (A fun, and would like to see concept, if Blizzard added support classes).

    Honestly, most those class choices are just buffed up of some other class. The only ones with a special concept is Tinker, Technomage. I don't know what a Titanborn is. And Demon Hunter is on a page of complete other subject. Unlike the Death Knight, who we raised for an army, Demon Hunters are few in general. High fail rate at training and would be considered a foe rather than a friend.
    all your choices are silly...i for one realy realy want demonhunters...most fit to lore...BARD?!?!?! u want it coz ur probably musician. templar? tinker? i would say they are much more sily then demonhunters

  15. #75
    I'd remove monks and give shaman a tank spec.

  16. #76
    Bloodsail Admiral Narna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Backyard. Digging for oil.
    Posts
    1,120
    I say no new class, but new specs!

    A lot of these options can be added as a spec to existing classes.

    Ranger/Sentinel/Warden = Hunter
    Templar/Spellbreaker = Paladin
    Witch Doctor/Spiritwalker = Shaman
    Battlemage/Spellbreaker = Mage
    etc.etc.

    You get the idea, why create new classes, when they could be new specs? I mean, specs can use different abilities all together, and still be under the same class.
    Troll's Life Mon.
    Nra|Hyah|Kyrei

  17. #77
    Mechagnome Iconja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    597
    Voted Spellbreaker because glaives and shields.
    ''The man who tells the tale is the one who decides history, he tells it wrong, and you have nothing more than a pretty story, he tells it right, and you have a legacy, you want a story told right, you ask someone who helped make it happen...''

  18. #78
    Most of the classes here are just specs of currently existing. Wardens are mix of warriors and rogues. Also for all you demon hunters fans - first demon hunter, Illidan Stormrage, was actually a mage, probably one of most talented and powerful in history.

    Spellbreakers and paladins have NOTHING in common. The spellbreaker class would be nice to see, but more as a spec. Instead of asking for new class I think we should ask for 4th spec for each class (like druids have). Would be way easier to balance and these specs could actually alter the class a bit more than existing, but require max level to pick (although it would create need for druids to have 5 specs). They could even be shared. This way warriors/rogues could become wardens, mages/warlocks demon hunters, hunters/death knights be dark rangers and so on.

  19. #79
    Moderator Gehco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    FEEL THE WRATH OF MY SPANNER!!
    Posts
    7,541
    Quote Originally Posted by bison91 View Post
    Demonhunters.

    - - - Updated - - -



    all your choices are silly...i for one realy realy want demonhunters...most fit to lore...BARD?!?!?! u want it coz ur probably musician. templar? tinker? i would say they are much more sily then demonhunters
    Bard choice was to see a support class added to the game.

    Templer is already in the game, via the Argent Dawn when they were there. Though, a Templer, if you don't know, is a much more offensive Paladin. A Tinker, if you don't know, is already within the content, as well today. An actively used class currently for NPCs. I am not really a musician, I just note that Bard fits some other people. Templar is not the same topic - but if you see silliness, then Demon Hunters and Tinkers would be in their own silly booth. As Demon Hunters are much, much fewer than Tinkers would be, as well as few races too. I have seen 2 different races of Demon Hunters, but Tinkers has what, 5 or so?

    This is not a versus thread, but just stating, the Demon Hunters would be as silly as any other choices. In the end, it is silly to expect a class of other choices, all we do is just wait for the content if to excist.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Iconja View Post
    Voted Spellbreaker because glaives and shields.
    That awkward moment where our current Blood Elf spellbreakers, are reskinned Night Elves - Even the armor is part of the skin, hence we don't see it appear.
    If you disapprove of moderation, seek an Admin or Global Moderator.
    Stuff can be fixed, just get enough glue or duct tape!
    R.I.P Project 'Titan' - My curious mind will still think of you!

  20. #80
    Moderator MoanaLisa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, USA
    Posts
    11,718
    Until they reverse some of the current class homogenization I don't think we need any new classes at all. Why add another class that just does the same thing as everyone else with different spell names?
    If you have anything to contribute to a thread topic, please do so. Discussing moderation or calling out specific people is against the rules and makes a post liable for an infraction. Please report problem posts. If anyone is unclear about the rules please read our FAQ. Thanks.

    It's a magical world, Hobbes, ol' buddy...let's go exploring!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •