I'm unsure of what you mean by this.
While a "Tesla store" may not run itself (I'm guessing you mean that dealerships are franchised and don't necessarily make all of their own business decisions, which is correct) it does provide jobs in the LOCAL market of where the product is actually being sold.
Apologies if that's not what you meant at all =)
You own a car dealership. Potential car buyer comes to your establishment and takes up the time of your salesman talking about and test driving a few cars. Potantial buyer leaves and buys at a discount direct from manufacturer. Yep. Sounds fair to me.
So a firm can't sell a car unless it's done via dealership? A firm can't just sell it off the production line?
That's just silly.
already happens with many other products - my guess the future will have showcase "booths" in stores instead of selling their products there. no longer will you actually take anything home from the mall, and whatever you purchased will most likely be at your house before you even get home. brick and mortar stores are a thing of the past, we just havent made the full transition yet, but we will.
- - - Updated - - -
really? you dont? might want to move that rock u been hiding under.
- - - Updated - - -
makes no sense - what of the many states that do allow it on sunday - how do they possibly manage... its a stupid archaic law that needs to be removed. simple, dont defend it.
It's fair and would force dealerships to be more competitive. The consumer, for a change, wins.
The franchises, in turn, could:
1. Lean down their operations to be competitive.
2. Negotiate franchise agreements that preclude retail sales in the region.
3. Negotiate lower wholesale costs.
4. Change to a different manufacturer with different policies. (If it's hard to get a test drive in the area, direct sales stop being a good idea.)
Oh you mean compete with an entity that does not have to employ a standing sales force, or purchase and maintain a location which enables them to capitalize on drive-by interest? Maybe you should take a trip to the real world, where real people have to do business. I won't bother rebutting any of your other comments because they have no semblance to the way auto dealership is actually contracted and enacted. You're just another child spewing idealism.
Like this store on the corner of a street which employs people and is at a location designed to attract interest?
Perhaps I'm subtly misinterpreting your point (by does not have to, do you mean do not or need not), which is a very real possibility because not all my mental processes are running atm.
I didn't defend it all, merely explained WHY those dealerships are closed (ie. not necessarily by choice, complications with financial institutions, etc. - certainly not "for a day off" as another poster suggested)
I personally think it's an outdated and unnecessary regulation, but preference doesn't change the actual reasons the laws/regulations exist (or were originally put in place anyway)
What I meant is that there are Tesla stores (physical locations), that do employ people in the local community to sell their products, much like an Apple Store employs people locally to sell the companies products.
The difference here being that the Tesla company, as far as I know, does not have franchised dealerships. So if you visit a Tesla dealer, you ARE still buying directly from the manufacturer. Which is the center of the issue in NJ. NJ wants to require Tesla to franchise to 3rd party Dealers to sell their products, essentially just erecting a middle man between the manufacturer and the consumer.
That sales force.....
It doesn't cost you a dime.. Car Salesmen earn their income reliant on actual sales.
Manufacturer sales are standard business, all over the world, and across all kinds of businesses. From clothing, to electronics, to vehicles.
This is nothing new at all, and always existed.
It's the manufacturers that have the HUGE storage lots where their goods are waiting for the dealerships to order them.
In the case of cars for example, the manufacturers rely on the dealerships to order the cars and sell them for a commission on the sales price. Now every year, around late September, beginning of October the new models go on the market. In October 2014, you can get the 2015 model of a car. Around that time, the manufacturers need room for the new merchandise. Even though you can buy from the car manufacturer all year long, but at that time they even advertise it.
Plus certain vehicles you can actually buy from the manufacturer only. The "one year" vehicles, that have been used by the management as business vehicle for a year, and are replaced with the newest model now. Those old ones which usually have barely any mileage on them. You can buy those from the manufacturer. They do not go to dealerships. The car is already heavily discounted, why spending transportation costs on them in addition?
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
NJ is such a backwards state when it comes to cars like its illegal to pump your own gas because of the "unions" or for "safety" reasons.
I'd wager it has more to do with all of the vested interests in dealerships and the money that they carry.
But yeah, I feel like this will be struck down.
- - - Updated - - -
So are you saying that it's unfair that dealerships are a poor business model?
"free market" at play.
where are those screaming for small government in all this? this seems like a great rally cry for them, oh wait I know....