Last edited by Agoonga; 2014-04-17 at 02:16 AM.
I'll also save you a trip back through the pages in this thread, certain individuals were implying, or just out right saying, that white men have it good on the material side of things, because most of the richest people are white men, the implication being that if you are a white man, you can't understand, or experience poverty (and your opinion on the matter has its value reduced). This is the stick. A logical fallacy to try and shame people, and sometimes silence people, if said people are being critical.
I stated quite clearly in the snippet you quoted who was being beat with it.
If any men's rights movement wants to be taken seriously, they need to kick the misogynists out. There are a few legitimate concerns, but they are drowned out by the deafening roar of upper middle class white male privilege misogynists.
It's part of the reason why the feminist movement (the real one) lost a lot of traction lately, the loud obnoxious feminazis are making a lot of noise, but they're nowhere near as representative of the feminist movement as the male privilege crowd is of the MRA/MRM.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Which for the most part are supplied by your own personal anecdotes.
Neither movement deserves the labels that their dissenters give out. I've never used my encounters with feminists/seeing Mindy Binx on Youtube and said "Yep, that's all feminists". Nor have I ever seen spouters of the "friend zone phenoma" who were also MRAs describe MRAs.
Last edited by THE Bigzoman; 2014-04-18 at 03:46 PM.
While i don't think those statistics are very accurate you have to consider that a relatively new movement/political idea is almost certainly going to consists mainly the young who are more open to new ways of thinking and the people who are most impacted by what they see as the goal of that movement in this case men.
It's not merely a question of "tone." Antifeminism is the foundation of the MRM; they take the sometimes legitimate grievances of males against societal gender orders and, in effect, blames them on women instead of on antiquated notions of masculinity and femininity that shackle both genders. The enemy of feminism is patriarchy; the enemy of any male-centered equivalent is also patriarchy.
The rest of it is just sophomoric misogyny mixed with reactionary politics. Civilized people have time for neither of those things.
Yay smear tactics. When I don't have a good argument I'll try to stereotype people into misery.
- - - Updated - - -
Hmmmmmm....
1, The survey is bound to have skewed data as it specifically surveys a platform that is known to have relatively young users. Also most social movements tend to be the most active in college age groups.
2, Those kids are bitching about something specific. They themselves feel as social outcasts, which they are, as society doesn't really care to lend them a helping hand, it's too busy making fun of them.
3, I'm 31 years old, college educated, well traveled, and financially stable and I vote left. While I don't agree with everything the MRM says or does, I'm not dumb enough to actually go out and say...WoW the world is a great place for men! And there is absolutely nothing to be improved upon!
Last edited by Mihalik; 2014-04-18 at 10:46 PM.
I stopped reading at Reddit.
Then I decided i'd actually read the thread a little further, and realized that I was in fact entirely correct to stop reading at Reddit.