Here's a pro tip, its called context.
Speeding in the context of deserted road, or just you and the cop, will get you a ticket.
Speeding in the context of traffic, with lots of people also going 4mph over, means you're largely ignored.
The smarter you are, the better you are at making sense of context.
Maybe you shouldn't speed? 4mph over is still over. And the road is a dangerous place. While I doubt 4 miles per hour would put you at any real great risk, it still COULD, and when you're gambling with your life, and the lives of others on the road, why would you exercise anything less than 100% complete caution and respect for the road's rules?
Passing on the right is also illegal....he was willing to exceeded the speed limit beyond what I was doing already, so why not just pass on the right? lol I just didn't care for his reasoning... gratful it was only a warning but still... if he left out the 'frustrating' part Id probably be more accepting of his reasoning of 'watch your speed and don't sit in the left lane'
He did ask for my license, asked if I had ever been arrested (nope) looked at the license, went on his marry way.
Ah, it seems that I am wrong about the 5 MPH thing. Honestly, I'm pretty sure I learned something like this in my DMV handbook over 10 years ago. I did some research below.
Source: http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/30000/30100/30132/810826.pdf
Searching through the document above, these common two fine systems seem to occur:
....that's literally what I said. Why are you forcing others to enact illegal measures just because you are? THAT'S a crap mind set, is what I also said. He's making sure you're not forcing others to make bad options just because you made one yourself. I agree, getting pulled over sucks for anything, even fi you're knowingly in the wrong and just got caught, but put yourself in their shoes and their job, and stop fearing the boys in blue.
[QUOTE=Kanegasi;26510248]Snip/QUOTE]
Fair play, few people here admit to being wrong :P
Here in Belgium it's around 10% error margin, but that also means that if you get a fine for doing 54km/h where you are allowed to do 50 km/h that you were doing 60km/h but the difference is already deducted.
It's really more of a safety concern. Not letting the person behind you pass you on a two lane road is a huge safety hazard for you, the driver behind you, and any other drivers/pedestrians nearby, even if that driver is speeding. Having one lane always being clear is much safer for everyone on the road, especially when emergency personnel need to get somewhere quickly.
It has nothing to do with equipment. It has more to do with how US traffic laws are written and the opportunity costs of enforcing traffic laws.
Basically in the US speeding fines are progressive in relation to your speed over the posted limit.
The fines for going 1-9mph over the limit are marginally low. They barely cover the officer's time for writing you up. Unless that officer has no other ticket opportunities (ie late at night, deserted road).
Traffic enforcement wait for bigger speeders because it means more money. Or their other favorite tactic... waiting. They'll follow you for a few miles, racking up all the minor infractions you commit, adding up to an over all larger fine. There are almost hundreds of minor traffic laws most lay people are not even aware of.
So if a cop is on your ass, its in your best interest to get him off of said ass. Move to the right... slow down etc..
So you admit to breaking two laws? Deal with the consequences. He let you off with a warning.
This much whining over a warning? The few times that I've gotten warnings I've driven away thinking positive thoughts about the officer who graciously let me off without a ticket.