i'm not defending anyone really, that is why i said if. i am neither qualified nor interested in reading the said patent, but you are wrong on the priority date. From the link of the OP, i read 1995 and 2002 priority date. The 2011 publication date is not important.
Sorry to waste your time though, there is a believe an ignore function on this forum. click on my name; go to my profile and add me to your ignore list.