22's don't have squat for recoil due to the size of the bullet and lack of power they pack. Try that with something larger and you easily see that there's heavy recoil that's being compensated for to keep the bullets on target.
For example:
Here's a 9mm Baretta as well. You can very obviously see him compensating for recoil.
If you've ever fired a gun, you'd realize that arguing for the complete lack of recoil in games like CoD is beyond ridiculous.
Last edited by Edge-; 2014-05-29 at 01:09 AM.
The thing iv always hated about the recoil in BF games is how over exagerated alot of the recoil is. Since iv fired a fair it of the weapons in real life i can atest not all of them have rediculus kickback like it shows in game specially when firing on semi mode.
My point was that the guy I quoted was saying that the battlefield recoil was laughable. But there are guns that have little to no recoil in real life, and I get that the m16 usually shoots bigger rounds, but even then it has almost no recoil. So there are some guns in battlefield that have little recoil and some that have pretty significant recoil, that doesn't make their representation of the real guns wrong.