Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ...
4
5
6
  1. #101
    There is no way Blizzard would ever do that.

  2. #102
    I would say yes but on the other hand sub numbers are what keep blizzard "in line" so to speak. If sub numbers hit a all time low during X expansion they know they went wrong somewhere and look for feedback I would assume, So in a world without sub numbers or reduced sub numbers blizzard could put out just about any content they want and tell the guys who bought a lifetime sub to suck it where someone paying a monthly fee can continue to vote with their wallet.
    Check out my livestream and follow me on twitter.

    I Livestream Daily and do giveaways.

  3. #103
    Scarab Lord prwraith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    the stars
    Posts
    4,414
    Now ? No.

    Few years ago sure.
    Hate people who read https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ and immediately think they're debate kings.

  4. #104
    For $2-300? Sure.

  5. #105
    Quote Originally Posted by Pann View Post
    Who in their right mind would pay between 600-1500 for a game?
    Star Citizen says hello.

  6. #106
    For $200-$300 i would. It'd save me money in the long run (exactly why they'll probably never offer this) .

  7. #107

  8. #108
    Mechagnome Jamyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Burning on the angry chair
    Posts
    611
    They would much more likely offer to tie you to a sub for a limited time, offering some other value added service with it, much like they did with the Annual Pass.
    Offering lifetime accounts only makes (business) sense when you know your lifetime is limited, so the day they announce it, you know the end-date for WoW is near (or at least known)

  9. #109
    $200? No way. I would regret it every time I get bad news in patch notes.

  10. #110
    Yes but blizz wouldn't do it. They'd lose money eventually.

  11. #111
    Brewmaster Zenotetsuken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Between my chair and keyboard
    Posts
    1,294
    The only way that I would do it is if I get all expansions that come out free as well, and it doesn't cost more than $14.99.

  12. #112
    and ppls said blizz is greedy, omg what a big big mistake, since only what I see here is...meh...

  13. #113
    Sure, if it was $60, like a normal B2P game.
    If you are particularly bold, you could use a Shiny Ditto. Do keep in mind though, this will infuriate your opponents due to Ditto's beauty. Please do not use Shiny Ditto. You have been warned.

  14. #114
    Lifetime sub? LMAO you might as well just cut ur dick off and mail it to blizzard in a box.

  15. #115
    Considering WoW costs $180 a year to play, $300 for a lifetime sub would pay off in 1.7 years. So I'd call that a massive fuck off bargain myself.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamyz View Post
    They would much more likely offer to tie you to a sub for a limited time, offering some other value added service with it, much like they did with the Annual Pass.
    I wish they'd do more APs. Free loot for me!
    Quote Originally Posted by Tojara View Post
    Look Batman really isn't an accurate source by any means
    Quote Originally Posted by Hooked View Post
    It is a fact, not just something I made up.

  16. #116
    Brewmaster Detheavn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    The Nether .... lands
    Posts
    1,438
    My lifetime, or WoW's lifetime?
    Big difference in what one would pay I guess

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •