Volcanoes have a multi-billion year head start on us. Or more. You have to account for that.
The 35-gigaton projected anthropogenic CO2 emission for 2010 is about 80 to 270 times larger than the respective maximum and minimum annual global volcanic CO2 emission estimates. It is 135 times larger than the highest preferred global volcanic CO2 estimate of 0.26 gigaton per year (Marty and Tolstikhin, 1998).
Nice - 16 year old data. But still - 135 times larger means that for every one year of 'anthropogenic' emissions means we need 135 years of volcanic emissions. So, the Industrial Age is roughly 200 years old, so that means it's the equivalent of 200 x 135 = 27,000 years of volcanic activity. So, what about the other 4 billion plus years of volcanic activity? Why isn't our atmosphere nothing but toxic gases and carbon dioxide?
Why? Because Viadd, Grand Arbiter of Correctness says so? - Masark
No, it's not. When I help someone, for example, I help someone I want to help. When the government does it, they might help someone who should not be helped.
(Queue racist, anti-poor, homophobe comments from the left-wing nuts)
- - - Updated - - -
So if it does, then why are we worried about our own production? Especially given the plateau the NY Times reported on?
Why? Because Viadd, Grand Arbiter of Correctness says so? - Masark
1. Here you go.
2. Perhaps you should read the entirety of the story you posted.
Furthermore :
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
So basically, there's still been no incriminating evidence found as to the investigation of the IRS's scrutiny of Tea Party groups.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
I cant wait until lois lerner is thrown in prison to rot, I will be so happy I may shed a tear for my pride in America.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
yes because those comments show intent with out a reasonable doubt he is already guilty of killing some one he has admitted as much just like the IRS has admitted for unfairly targeting those conservative groups only thing now to prove is intent did he purposely kill the person or was it an accident and comments like I had posted is a clear indication of intent beyond a reasonable doubt
take the man who left his child strapped to a car seat in his car that died from the heat. he claims it was an accident. but they found a search on his computer on "how long would it take for a child to die an a car from the heat". is that a confession? is that an admission of what he was planning on doing? no it is not but what it does show is intent. can he be convicted of intentionally leaving his child in the car to die on just that alone yes he can
Last edited by Vyxn; 2014-07-31 at 07:59 PM.
Why? Because Viadd, Grand Arbiter of Correctness says so? - Masark
I wonder what prison she will be sent to?. Would it be like Leavenworth or can they pick which one?. I would send her to Miami dade county jail if it were up to me.