"I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. "
- General Jack D. Ripper.
Imagine how much you have to piss off a Buddhist monk for him to reply with violence.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/sa...ermany-n196421
They probably pulled some similar shit.
This is valid, and acceptable, since the situation/condition dictates the preparedness.
Where the Sancho Pansa feeling comes to play is how difficult, and near impossible it is, to explain to Americans that there is no such need at all, if you have a lid on the situation. Americans need arms a lot more than Europeans, since they allowed the rather uncontrolled spread of firearms. That resulted in the as is situation where criminals are likely armed with them. There's a spiral going on...
Criminal has firearm to commit crime.
Citizen needs firearm to defend.
Criminal gets hand on citizens firearm.
Citizen needs another firearm better than the old one.
Citizen with firearm turns criminal.
Next citizen needs better firearm..
And the wheel keeps spinning.. Out of control..
Europe doesn't have such concern.. While it isn't impossible to run into an armed criminal, the chances therefore are a lot lower.
All in all, it's safer over there across the pond.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
Did you read the article?
Remind you of anything.Tellingly, the violence began in a gold shop. The movements in both countries exploit a sense of economic grievance - a religious minority is used as the scapegoat for the frustrated aspirations of the majority.
Hell, Muslims attack Christians and Muslims are bad, Buddhists attack Muslims and Muslims brought it upon themselves.
It shows that Buddhists are as prone to mindless violence as any other religion.
The UK suffered at the hands of terrorists for decades, terrorism largely funded by citizens of the USA. These terrorist groups were made up of Christians of different denominations. If we are to brand Muslims as terrorists, why not Christians to?
But they are very peace loving.Christian crusaders, Islamist militants, or the leaders of "freedom-loving nations", all justify what they see as necessary violence in the name of a higher good. Buddhist rulers and monks have been no exception.
Buddhist monks take part in a demonstration against the Organisation of the Islamic Conference in Rangoon, in October 2012
So, historically, Buddhism has been no more a religion of peace than Christianity.
One of the most famous kings in Sri Lankan history is Dutugamanu, whose unification of the island in the 2nd Century BC is related in an important chronicle, the Mahavamsa.
It says that he placed a Buddhist relic in his spear and took 500 monks with him along to war against a non-Buddhist king.
He destroyed his opponents. After the bloodshed, some enlightened ones consoled him that the slain "were like animals; you will make the Buddha's faith shine".
He didn't behead the cat because he blamed it but because he thought the cat is the only eyewitness so it must be done. Muslim/islam are so rudely offensive and dangerous culture/race for some reason. I'm so happy we don't have many of them in eastern europe - however we have other race problems like gipsy thieves and arab/russian mafia but they do not behead random people in the street just for some personal idealism. Thanks for Mother of God they're definitely way under the islam/muslim level of barbaric violence - at least for the ordinary citizen.
Yeah this notion that Buddhism is especially peaceful is really just a stereotype. People are violent under the right circumstances. Faith doesn't change that.
This discussion thread has really moved into a debate of Islam, Christianity, and Buddhism, which isn't allowed here.
Closing.