Man convicted for 'illegal' drawings of underaged cartoons characters in the UK.

[Deleted]

No wonder the UK seems a go-to country when it comes for locations where dystopian future books/movies play

This man was convicted for thought crime, I feel for him

[Deleted]

No wonder the UK seems a go-to country when it comes for locations where dystopian future books/movies play

This man was convicted for thought crime, I feel for him

It's not really so much a thought crime when it shows minors depicted in art having sexual relations with men though, is it?

I agree it's silly to jail, or rather threaten to jail people (He received a suspended sentence) but the Judge seemingly was acting upon his own moral guideline that these images normalize the potential abuse of children.

And, if i had to push myself, i'd agree with him in part; They're incredibly distasteful to me, but i respect that so far they're "Legal", this ruling seemingly challenges that.

[Deleted]

Watch out child pornography coming through



- - - Updated - - -



I hope this was sarcastic, but probably not.
They said that about homosexuals too.

Do not try and compare two consenting adults to pedophilia, we both know children cannot give consent.

[Video Games]

Do not try and compare two consenting adults to pedophilia, we both know children cannot give consent.

What pedophilia? He didn't touch any kids.

[ProphetFlume]

How do they prove the pictures were of underage girls and not just asians?

[Deleted]

I think it's pretty bad when it's drawings/animated to be sentenced for it. I'd rather see pedophiles have a way of outlet through drawings/animated stuff than to actual pictures or videos of kids being abused.

[Canpinter]

What pedophilia? He didn't touch any kids.

pedophiles are simply people who are attacked to kids regardless of if they act on it or not

[Deleted]

Do not try and compare two consenting adults to pedophilia, we both know children cannot give consent.

oh, that's rich. Pedophilia, no matter how you look at it, is quite legal.

Fucking children however isn't. Maybe someone should put a disclaimer on those pics "no childrens were harmed in the drawing of these pictures"

[alucardtnuoc]

Watch out child pornography coming through



- - - Updated - - -



I hope this was sarcastic, but probably not.
They said that about homosexuals too.

Shame you didn't sign it, might have been able to sell it when you go to jail!

[Deleted]

What pedophilia? He didn't touch any kids.

No he never, but he certainly had the idea in his head and therefor needed help. I would never advocate jail time for thinking about doing it but psychiatric help would be beneficial.

[Video Games]

pedophiles are simply people who are attacked to kids regardless of if they act on it or not

Sure. What about high school anime girls?

No he never, but he certainly had the idea in his head and therefor needed help. I would never advocate jail time for thinking about doing it but psychiatric help would be beneficial.

The idea for fake highshcool anime girls. He had no real cp.

[Deleted]

Do not try and compare two consenting adults to pedophilia, we both know children cannot give consent.

Can drawn adults give consent?
If you were to collect images of drawn naked males and jack off to them or whatever, would that be illegal?

[Arch0s]

"he had been physically attacked since the allegations were publicised, he said"

Ah, good old Middlesbrough. If you're are even remotely different from the common populace you'll be beaten for it!

[Deleted]

It's been illegal here for a significant amount of time, he should have known.

[Sting]

Nothing wrong with a drawing, it's fictional.

[NuLogic]

I think it's pretty bad when it's drawings/animated to be sentenced for it. I'd rather see pedophiles have a way of outlet through drawings/animated stuff than to actual pictures or videos of kids being abused.

Is your avatar the black rock shooter girl? Looks like it.

- - - Updated - - -

Do not try and compare two consenting adults to pedophilia, we both know children cannot give consent.

Didn't know images needed to give consent.

[JohnBrown1917]

well child porn is child porn, and using some weird japan anime /manga / whatever it is called shit to masquerade it wont change anything.

So where do you draw the line?

Only 10 counts? I have almost 100 gigs in a folder on my computer. I'd probably get life.

You sick fuck, how dare you harm all those fictional kids?

p.s fanservice anime/manga also counts, you better lube up that anus for Bubba.

[Deleted]

Nothing wrong with a drawing, it's fictional.

But the imaginary children

[Giscoicus]

UK pls stop

Think of the lolis

[srathgar]

Reading through the article, this guy seems to be more of a victim to crusading judges.
If the judges can start ruling with theese kind of reasons then i dont know anymore.

He added: “This is material that clearly society and the public can well do without. Its danger is that it obviously portrays sexual activity with children, and the more it’s portrayed, the more the ill-disposed may think it’s acceptable.”

He gave Hoque a nine-month prison sentence suspended for two years. He said anything that encouraged child abuse, including word of mouth, drawings or artistic impressions, was to be “actively discouraged”.

What i read in that statement from the judge is that because of an extremely small ammount of people that cant control their urges it has to be banned. What is the next thing? drawing weapons banned too? Drawing animals because they are like not wearing stuff and could be seen as sexual to some?

Now you may not agree with me but seriously this is not a direction i find healthy at all, especially when he goes with "the more ill-disposed people" as his argument.