So, I recently read through this article - http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-29946114
tl;dr : strippers are licensed as per the state of Washington, which apparently extends freedom of speech through the freedom of information act to access their personal information. The state was sued to prevent this release, on the basis that release of this information was a potential danger to the health and well being of those in question.
The biggest concern for this even for those not concerned about right to private of strippers is, of course, the precedents down the road. For example, every health care worker is registered as per the state; what exactly would prevent one from obtaining the personal information of a doctor, in order to pressure/force them to write prescriptions for narcotics? What about gun owners?
So do people think that this extension of freedom of speech is right, in addressing individuals who are registered as per the government but are not actually public servants? At some point does right to privacy trump freedom of speech?