How soon before Obama is impeached?

[cutterx2202]

So we all know President Obama has committed many constitutional violations and not performing his duties, and continues to do so. How long will it be before Congress performs its sworn duty to impeach him?

-6 months?
-1 year?
-before the end of his term?
-Never, because Congress is also neglecting its sworn duties.

Thoughts?

[lockedout]

So we all know President Obama has committed many constitutional violations and not performing his duties, and continues to do so. How long will it be before Congress performs its sworn duty to impeach him?

-6 months?
-1 year?
-before the end of his term?
-Never, because Congress is also neglecting its sworn duties.

Thoughts?

Obama won't get impeached. No one wants Shotgun Joe Biden as president.

[shimerra]

My thoughts are that this is a loaded thread created not out of intent for honest discussion from a position of intelligence but from a deep place of partisan ignorance seeking to bait passionate reaction.

Also in the words of zoidberg you are bad and should feel bad for making it.

[HardlyWaken]

My question is why are people still asking about this? I'm fairly sure if it was going to happen it would have by now... Is this just a weird obsession or what?

[Blueobelisk]

Can you give examples of the constitutional violations and duties he didn't perform?

[Arthas242]

Obama won't get impeached. No one wants Shotgun Joe Biden as president.

as bad as obama is.....

this reaosn is valid...

biden would just be worse as he can not speak without sounding stupid.

- - - Updated - - -

Can you give examples of the constitutional violations and duties he didn't perform?

please do not play dumb, immigration? he is even on tape saying what he is exactly doing is against the constitution.......

[Independent voter]

Why would they impeach Obama? They impeached Clinton for lying about Monica, this pissed the voters off and a bunch of Republicans were booted out of office. I would think that if the Republicans impeached Obama for no reason whatsoever, the Republicans would suffer from a lot of voter wrath.

[cutterx2202]

My question is why are people still asking about this? I'm fairly sure if it was going to happen it would have by now... Is this just a weird obsession or what?

People keep asking, such as my self, because he has violated the law, the constitution, and his oath, but there has yet to be any consequences. We are a nation of laws, and without consequence for breaking them, we will become a memory.

[Independent voter]

People keep asking, such as my self, because he has violated the law, the constitution, and his oath, but there has yet to be any consequences. We are a nation of laws, and without consequence for breaking them, we will become Rome.

Umm, no he hasn't.

[cutterx2202]

Umm, no he hasn't.

If you're of this mindset, you're living under a rock. The supreme court even ruled he has.

[Spectral]

If the Republicans were to impeach Obama for blatant Constitutional violations, they wouldn't have any excuse for their next President's blatant Constitutional violations. That is not a political road they'd like to head down.

[Independent voter]

If you're of this mindset, you're living under a rock. The supreme court even ruled he has.

On what issue did the Supreme Court decide that Obama had broken the law?

[powerstuck]

-Never, because Congress is also neglecting its sworn duties.

The answer is above. Also if Obama has committed many constitutional violations, I wonder how many his predecessor did (and I know the answer is far from zero).

[tj119]

What he is doing with immigration is very worthy of being impeached and it makes me rather sick to just throw out those rules and basically shit on those who took the right steps to become citizens. I'd prefer someone just assasinate him but that would be a miracle.

[WskyDK]

He won't be impeached.

[lockedout]

On what issue did the Supreme Court decide that Obama had broken the law?

Washington, D.C. – House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) released the statement below following the Supreme Court’s ruling that President Obama violated the U.S. Constitution by going around the Senate to appoint individuals to the National Labor Relations Board. http://judiciary.house.gov/index.cfm...tive-overreach

[Argarock]

If you're of this mindset, you're living under a rock. The supreme court even ruled he has.

some fucking sources would be nice if you're going to be saying stuff like this

I'm not american so I've given up trying to pay attention at this point, but Obama really seems like the only sane option from an outside standpoint
(ok, not voting for either of the 2 major parties is the actual sane option but hey!)

[cutterx2202]

If the Republicans were to impeach Obama for blatant Constitutional violations, they wouldn't have any excuse for their next President's blatant Constitutional violations. That is not a political road they'd like to head down.

Ha! Option D may be true.

[Independent voter]

Washington, D.C. – House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) released the statement below following the Supreme Court’s ruling that President Obama violated the U.S. Constitution by going around the Senate to appoint individuals to the National Labor Relations Board. http://judiciary.house.gov/index.cfm...tive-overreach

"Because the Senate was in session during its pro forma sessions, the president made the recess appointments before us during a break too short to count as recess," said Breyer, the lone justice to have worked for the Senate. "For that reason, the appointments are invalid."

Oh! The humanity!

[furydeath]

The republicans even said they never would cause it would be "bad for them" in 2016 or something like that.