I've read the stickies, don't freak out mods, I'm asking for some clarification on a point that was made but seemed contradictory, and I want to ask about Crimson Tempest.
So far when I'm in a single target fight, I'm getting to 5 CP applying Rupture, then getting to 5 CP and hitting Envenom. However, even with Glyph of Energy and the talent giving me 155 base energy and increased regen... There are still times when I cannot get 5 CP built fast enough before Envenom drops. This is especially true when it comes time to reapply 5 CP rupture. Am I doing something wrong or is this ok?
During my training dummy session last night, I noticed that Crimson Tempest used exclusively instead of Envenom was yielding an increase of about 600-800 dps... It's my understanding that Venomous Wounds is built into Rupture now and is guaranteed to proc, and isn't based on the same proc chance as Wounding Poison. The question seems to be is 30% more procs better than 30% more damage from the procs we already have? When I used CT instead of Env it causes my Venomous Wounds to shoot up above my white damage with almost exactly the same number of applications as if I use Envenom... This to me seems to suggest that we benefit more from, more damage instead of more procs?
During AOE situations, I am using FoK's to build CP's and then using rupture on each mob, but I'm currently waiting for 5 CP, and I'm finding that takes too long to fully apply to all mobs especially 4 + pulls... I've read that some rogues are just using 1 FoK and then applying the 1 or 2 cp rupture and moving on, should I continue to wait for 5 stacks or should I be using this method?
Sorry for the wall of text, thanks for your time.