Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst
1
2
  1. #21
    I feel uneasy about the whole thing, but I suppose it's a necessary evil we do to rapidly speed up medical science (screw cosmetics).
    "In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance

  2. #22
    Deleted
    I'm divided on this issue

    On the one hand, I'm a treehugging hippie who believes everything that lives should be respected.

    On the other hand, I like eating meat and I would like there to be a cure for cancer one day.

  3. #23
    Titan Grimbold21's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Azores, Portugal
    Posts
    11,838
    Aren't the United States prisons over populated?

    There's your solution

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimbold21 View Post
    Aren't the United States prisons over populated?

    There's your solution
    Yea let's go test medicine on people first instead of animals.

    Hi Mengele, I didn't know you were still around

  5. #25
    Titan Grimbold21's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Azores, Portugal
    Posts
    11,838
    Quote Originally Posted by StayTuned View Post
    Yea let's go test medicine on people first instead of animals.

    Hi Mengele, I didn't know you were still around
    Oh? The ethics change when we go from animals to people?

  6. #26
    People don't seem to mind what is done to rats. When you start using cats and dogs they notice, monkeys make people hesitant and using chimps makes people nuts. To me a human is still more valuable than an animal so I'm for animal testing as long as it's done as humanely as possible.

    For the Ebola vaccine they got some religious types to try it out on. That's interesting.
    .

    "This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."

    -- Capt. Copeland

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimbold21 View Post
    Oh? The ethics change when we go from animals to people?
    So ethics change when we go from criminals to non criminals?

    As to your question: yes, to a certain degree.

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by StayTuned View Post
    Medical tests: yes
    Cosmetic tests: no
    ^ This right here.

  9. #29
    Titan Charge me Doctor's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Russia, Chelyabinsk (Tankograd)
    Posts
    13,849
    I'm fine with it, we can't really grow bunch of humans and use them as test subjects. And i can't imagine how drunk you have to be to give a consent to be test subject for tests executed on animals. You know, there is a reason for it, people can die. Don't worry, it will stop when scientists will be able to create artificial organisms to run tests on, but for now they have to use animals instead
    Quote Originally Posted by Urban Dictionary
    Russians are a nation inhabiting territory of Russia an ex-USSR countries. Russians enjoy drinking vodka and listening to the bears playing button-accordions. Russians are open- and warm- hearted. They are ready to share their last prianik (russian sweet cookie) with guests, in case lasts encounter that somewhere. Though, it's almost unreal, 'cos russians usually hide their stuff well.

  10. #30
    Animal testing is a necessary evil.

  11. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by StayTuned View Post
    Medical tests: yes
    Cosmetic tests: no
    I'm right there too ^

  12. #32
    To paraphrase Ed Bundy from Modern Family "Win a war, then you can have a say", so let Dogs and Cats rise up and protest, until then, test away!

    Really, I'm against it, but there really isn't an alternative - we'd run out of humans to test on at some point.
    Quote Originally Posted by THE Bigzoman View Post
    Meant Wetback. That's what the guy from Home Depot called it anyway.
    ==================================
    If you say pls because it is shorter than please,
    I'll say no because it is shorter than yes.
    ==================================

  13. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimbold21 View Post
    Oh? The ethics change when we go from animals to people?
    Yes, they do. They even change depending on the species.

  14. #34
    Bloodsail Admiral Zonned's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,029
    If the testing is scientifically beneficial to humans such as medicine then yes, if its for something stupid like perfumes or makeup then no.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •