I feel uneasy about the whole thing, but I suppose it's a necessary evil we do to rapidly speed up medical science (screw cosmetics).
I feel uneasy about the whole thing, but I suppose it's a necessary evil we do to rapidly speed up medical science (screw cosmetics).
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
I'm divided on this issue
On the one hand, I'm a treehugging hippie who believes everything that lives should be respected.
On the other hand, I like eating meat and I would like there to be a cure for cancer one day.
Aren't the United States prisons over populated?
There's your solution
People don't seem to mind what is done to rats. When you start using cats and dogs they notice, monkeys make people hesitant and using chimps makes people nuts. To me a human is still more valuable than an animal so I'm for animal testing as long as it's done as humanely as possible.
For the Ebola vaccine they got some religious types to try it out on. That's interesting.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
I'm fine with it, we can't really grow bunch of humans and use them as test subjects. And i can't imagine how drunk you have to be to give a consent to be test subject for tests executed on animals. You know, there is a reason for it, people can die. Don't worry, it will stop when scientists will be able to create artificial organisms to run tests on, but for now they have to use animals instead
Originally Posted by Urban Dictionary
To paraphrase Ed Bundy from Modern Family "Win a war, then you can have a say", so let Dogs and Cats rise up and protest, until then, test away!
Really, I'm against it, but there really isn't an alternative - we'd run out of humans to test on at some point.
If the testing is scientifically beneficial to humans such as medicine then yes, if its for something stupid like perfumes or makeup then no.