Is it anything new?
The more money You have the more money You make through investments or bank savings or whatever.
Also You can lose more or earn more. Depends on luck/predictions/risk management/etc
On the other hand if you don't have money or spend almost everything You have (or you live by the debt), you're not accumulating money or even lose it in the long run(Your overall wealth is declining).
So the rich are richer by the time pass by and poor are poorer and the gap between them is increasing more and more.
Nope, you have in your mind that rich people don't deserve what they have in all cases, and you're also acting like I am saying rich people are smarter and superior to the middle class. You're just making a huge stupid assumption that makes you look like an ass.
- - - Updated - - -
Be careful using logic, you will get attacked by people who hate the rich and think the world is screwing them.
Yup I clearly said Pew Research is an idiot. Clearly.
You must be a troll. No one can be this daft. My god.
- - - Updated - - -
Assets come in crazy wide range of costs. I don't what comes to your mind when you think of the word 'asset'.
Infracted
Last edited by Kasierith; 2014-12-22 at 11:59 PM.
The income gap is being made worse by loose monetary policy that promotes equity and real estate bubbles. The cheap money by our central bankers are promoting this gap. Our politicians need this cheap money to keep the national debt under control and to keep the welfare state going so they can keep buying votes. If you stop the welfare state, stop the cheap money, and stop punishing savers, then the average Joe would be much better off.
This here exactly, there is no reason any one man should have so much money. People that hoard their money like that HURT the Economy, not help it. They only help themselves, and that is what makes them worse than what the OP calls "welfare lobsters." Look back at when Bill Clinton was in office, thanks to him we had a boom of the U.S. economy and the United States had a projected federal budget surplus for the first time since 1969. We were almost out of the deficit. He taxed the upper classes, people that have the money and SHOULD be taxed.
Generational wealth for starters can be a home. However due to the age of home refi, reverse mortgage and home used as ATM, parents dont have much to pass on to their kids. Then again, how many parents do you see own their homes by the time they retire or die? So each new generation of working class has to start at square one while the kids of wealthy families get a head start.
The poor are not richer standard of living is flat, and median family incomes are decreasing. In 1964 The minimum wage was $1.25. If you were paid in 5 1964 quarters, the melt value of that silver would be worth about $14 right now.
Look at incomes distributed among percentiles. Incomes are rarely this skewed. The good news is, with us moving so far from the norm and average...a reversion to the mean is likely in the coming decades.
Depends on if they're hoarding it or not. If they aren't (which they shouldn't) they shouldn't be taxed. If they want to sit on it and make capital gains from sleazy investments, then sure, tax them their gains.
- - - Updated - - -
The basis of human civilization is that not everybody is going to be as well off as the top tier. That's just how it goes. That's how it's been since Ancient Sumeria. That's how it will be until the end of the Terran empire.