Poll: Are wind turbines bad or are they good?

Thread: Wind Turbines

Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
5
... LastLast
  1. #41
    Fluffy Kitten Yvaelle's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Darnassus
    Posts
    11,331
    Think of it this way - when we walk around we move slowly (compared to most animals, especially birds) - when we fall down we have relatively hard bones compared to most animals, and we can fall down as tall as we are (unless we fall off a cliff or something): I'm 6'2", if I fall down the maximum acceleration my head can reach in that time is 6'2" times earth acceleration. Human beings are designed to fall throughout their lives and be no worse for wear, or run headlong into prey and get back and do it again - we're war machines - we're Orks.

    Birds have shitty hollow tubes for bones to reduce weight, it's like rolled tubes of paper, and they fly headfirst - at incredible speed. If they hit anything, it's headfirst, going 30-200km/h, protected by only a sheet of poster paper for a skull. It would be like headbutting an oncoming car, when your skull is already fractured - that is how birds live their lives. Oh, and when they headbutt something at highway speeds - that is almost always only the first impact, since they are usually some distance off the ground - if they hit a wind turbine they a) hit the turbine, and b) fall 150 feet.

    Birds die, that's how birds do.
    Last edited by Yvaelle; 2015-01-16 at 12:17 PM.
    Youtube ~ Yvaelle ~ Twitter

  2. #42
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Tokru View Post
    You would be suprised of how much of European forests are actually man made. Nearly all of it that doesn't happen to be situated on steep hill sides.
    Oh, I know very well that most forests have been affected by man, the only place in Sweden where you can find non-man affected forests are in the absolute northwestern corner of the country. But the forest itself is still a living, self-sufficient system. You don't need humans for forests to grow leaves, or for the trees to breath oxygen. Whereas in agriculture you do need to a certain extent humans to take care of the soil if you want things to grow in any sufficient way, for example.

  3. #43
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Yvaelle View Post
    You're missing my option - I think they're pretty

    They don't need to be near human civilization though, that's what cables are for - so I don't really see why it's always a question of whether or not we should live in their shafts or something - they aren't oil-operated lighthouses that need a live-in attendant or anything.
    I'm always impressed by the sheer size of them things.
    I remember seeing one on the side of a mountain in crete. Imposing.
    I like them... somewhere else obviously

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Yvaelle View Post
    Think of it this way - when we walk around we move slowly (compared to most animals, especially birds) - when we fall down we have relatively hard bones compared to most animals, and we can fall down as tall as we are (unless we fall off a cliff or something): I'm 6'2", if I fall down the maximum acceleration my head can reach in that time is 6'2" times earth acceleration. Human beings are designed to fall throughout their lives and be no worse for wear, or run headlong into prey and get back and do it again - we're war machines - we're Orks.

    Birds have shitty hollow tubes for bones to reduce weight, it's like rolled tubes of paper, and they fly headfirst - at incredible speed. If they hit anything, it's headfirst, going 30-200km/h, protected by only a sheet of poster paper for a skull. It would be like headbutting an oncoming car, when your skull is already fractured - that is how birds live their lives. Oh, and when they headbutt something at highway speeds - that is almost always only the first impact, since they are usually some distance off the ground - if they hit a wind turbine they a) hit the turbine, and b) fall 150 feet.

    Birds die, that's how birds do.
    Fuck yeah now you're talking Yvaelle.

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by zorkuus View Post
    Once we move to nuclear fusion the waste problem will be far less of an issue.
    I don't think you even need fusion, just different reactors. There are some pretty bizarre ones out there like the thorium reactor - which needs electricity to power it so it can never melt down and produces nothing bad. It just doesn't work very well right now.

  5. #45
    Titan Gumboy's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Lost in Space
    Posts
    11,649
    Quote Originally Posted by Yvaelle View Post
    Birds die, that's how birds do.
    I like when birds die most of the time because then I get to eat them, but it seems like a ridiculous thing to kill them, a giant spinny thing randomly in their way, its like a hard mode mario level with instant death...so super meat boy basically.
    You're a towel.

  6. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by Yvaelle View Post
    Birds die, that's how birds do.
    They do, yes, no disagreement with your post.

    I've been lucky (?) to have a nesting pair of cardinals here the last few summers. I have no idea how birds do it, but wherever they went in the winter, they find their way back in the summer.

    Let's all ride the Gish gallop.

  7. #47
    Mechagnome
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    749
    I'm fine with them where they are. I've never seen any windmills in areas that I'd like to inhabit. I'm sure there's plenty that exist. But Palm Springs? That's literally all that place is worth, I'm glad the finally found a use for that wasteland.

  8. #48
    Fluffy Kitten Yvaelle's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Darnassus
    Posts
    11,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Gumboy View Post
    I like when birds die most of the time because then I get to eat them, but it seems like a ridiculous thing to kill them, a giant spinny thing randomly in their way, its like a hard mode mario level with instant death...so super meat boy basically.
    This means two things to me:
    1) We should start a company that collects bird corpses below turbines as food (McNuggets, probably)
    2) We should collectively afford more respect to birds, because yes - they play life on Nightmare difficulty.
    Youtube ~ Yvaelle ~ Twitter

  9. #49
    Why is 'carbon footprint is a myth' one of the options? No one disagrees with the fact that some things use more carbon to produce than others, people (generally republicans) disagree that there is any reason to believe that anthropogenic climate change is happening.

  10. #50
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Holyyoloswag View Post
    Why is 'carbon footprint is a myth' one of the options? No one disagrees with the fact that some things use more carbon to produce than others, people (generally republicans) disagree that there is any reason to believe that anthropogenic climate change is happening.
    huh, oh that was sarcasm more than anything, - it's also a don't care at all option.
    Personally i'm not bothered by wind turbines, think they're a good thing. As long as they're in a place where the wind actually generates power regularly. Granted if there was one in my backyard i would be a bit like "that's a bit close" but then i'd be like "yay, my mortgage doesn't mean i need to sell my kidneys"

  11. #51
    The Unstoppable Force Belize's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gen-OT College of Shitposting
    Posts
    21,940
    But if we harness the wind power, then there's going to be less wind and the planet will get warmer...

    I say we burn more coal!

  12. #52
    Warchief Tokru's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    The end of the rainbow
    Posts
    2,164
    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    But if we harness the wind power, then there's going to be less wind and the planet will get warmer...
    We should all open our fridges for one day to compensate for that.

  13. #53
    On a side note Republican Joe Barton thinks wind power is bad because we only have so much wind and if we keep harnessing it we will run out making the world hotter 0.0

    - US Rep Joe Barton, member of House Committee on Energy, quoted as saying: "Wind is a finite resource and harnessing it would slow the winds down, which would cause the temperature to go up."

  14. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by Tokru View Post
    We should all open our fridges for one day to compensate for that.
    Carnot would approve!

    Let's all ride the Gish gallop.

  15. #55
    The Unstoppable Force Belize's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gen-OT College of Shitposting
    Posts
    21,940
    Quote Originally Posted by Tokru View Post
    We should all open our fridges for one day to compensate for that.
    Huh, I never though of that...

  16. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    But if we harness the wind power, then there's going to be less wind and the planet will get warmer...

    I say we burn more coal!
    Too many turbines will also slow down the planets rotation and at one point it will stop.

  17. #57
    Over 9000! Santti's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    9,117
    I wouldn't mind having a wind turbine or a couple of them near my house. They are not that ugly. The only thing I'm concerned about is the noise. Can faintly hear it at my house? That's fine. Can hear it in my house? Depends.

  18. #58
    A few facts about nuclear waste disposal since there's a lot of misinformation in this thread:

    - it is not harmless after a few decades but stays toxic for 100 000+ years
    - in final disposal there is no need for monitoring, replacing canisters or anything like it
    - it is not true that is it an unresolved issue; final deposition of nuclear waste will start in early 2020 here in Finland and soon in Sweden as well I assume (the site has been chosen and construction is in process)
    - there are no unresolved technical problems with final disposal, the reason many countries do nothing is purely lack of political will and major nimbyism

    For more information, check http://www.posiva.fi/en/final_dispos...y#.VLkaPCusUXg , the company that is building our nuclear waste repository site.

    As for wind power, it's nice but I'm very dubious when I see claims of 40-50 % power generation by wind; tend to assume that's only possible because they can rely on being connected to grid with someone else that can provide the necessary backup power.

  19. #59
    Elemental Lord Reg's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    8,264
    The should just make them produce bubbles to make it pretty.

    I don't really care what they look like as long as they are productive. I'd say put one on top of every building in NYC if it were worth it. Someone go study it!

  20. #60
    Warchief Tokru's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    The end of the rainbow
    Posts
    2,164
    Quote Originally Posted by Teph View Post
    Too many turbines will also slow down the planets rotation and at one point it will stop.
    Only if they face the wrong way! We should point them all westwards and use surplus energy that is generated on hot days to power them. This way they will accelerate earth which shortens days so we won't have to work that much anymore!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •