"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
Was excited because as much as I enjoy DayZ's concepts, it just never worked in practice and the development has been slow as shit. H1Z1 has potential even if it's just "more of the same." Simply because of its pedigree. I dunno if I wanna shell out $20 for early access...but I do need something to play.
Plus I have like a billion station cash from playing Planetside 2...so that'd be fun to use up.
I'm not even sure if I care about the complaints so far...P2W has never been an issue for me whether I take part it in or not. If someone's gotta spend $20 to get on my level, I don't care. Just makes it all the sweeter when I whoop 'em. I've lived through and enjoyed APB (even after G1 bought it) which is about as P2W as it gets and still wrecked nerds like it was my job. My concerns start and stop with "is it fun, and does it work/make sense."
So for all of the airdrop whining, I just want it to do more...I don't care what's in it or isn't in it. As long as it adds something interesting to the game. Injecting PvP hot spots is certainly something that could be interesting.
yes I am aware this post was very "internet tough guy'ish"...but fuck it, I'm a goddamn hero.
I bet most of the people who have given negative reviews on steam don't bother taking up that offer for a refund. We'll see how it goes.
Tried to play yesterday, couldn't connect to login servers, didn't even know about the airdrops till this morning. Really don't care because I just can't see people buying it if they know it attracts bandits and zeds. Dunno how my friend is gonna take it, he gets all emo when p2w is involved. I might still piddle around with it, might ask for a refund and wait for killing floor 2 if I dont have a group because of this.
Your powers are useless on me you silly billy...
I'm not sure what's more disgusting: an alpha game releasing with working micro-transactions, or people actually buying them.
With regards to airdrops:
Sony expressly stated their intent and reasoning BEFORE the game went into early access. From a recent blog post almost a day before access was opened;
It is the DESIGN INTENTION that airdrops be contested, risky and not guaranteed to the purchasing player.We have made the decision to allow paid for airdrops into the game with things like guns and other things being randomly selected as part of the airdrop. We’re making them highly contested and building a whole set of rules around this, but you should be aware that our goal is to make this a way to keep things interesting on the servers but still be contested. If these offend your sensibilities just know that they are going to be there. We have gone out of our way to make sure the airdrops are contested in-game and that you can’t simply expect to easily walk about to the airdrop and grab it. Even if you paid for it.
Airdrops are meant to make things interesting or just raise a commotion as the game relies on emergent gameplay interactions.
Right? Stupid gamers getting mad at devs making pay to win/pre release bugged to shit games. Youre defending a company thats using shitty market strats to trick dumb kids with money. And they are getting them to beta test the game while getting paid! This is like... grimy shit here dude. Any negative buzz about this game or any like it is a good for gaming.
H1Z1 CRASHES AS SOON AS YOU LOAD INTO THE MAP. H1Z1 LETS YOU BUY A RIFLE THAT CAN SHOOT THROUGH WALLS WITH REAL MONEY. H1Z1 LETS YOU "DONATE" REAL MONEY FOR AN INVINCIBILITY BUFF DEPENDING ON HOW MUCH YOU SPEND.
Fuck this game, any game like it, and the devs who made them.
Actually, yes. Stupid gamers.
It is pre-release. A game in active live development that has not even had a beta yet. There are fully released games with multi-million dollar budgets that are have programing bugs. That is the nature of software development.
Even more so in the case of software that is expressly stated and actively in development pre-release. Bugs in the software as an issue to the end user at this stage of development is beneath concern.
There is also a total misuse and gross misunderstanding of the English language going on here. Pay-to-win literally is stating paying is directly contributing to winning, in this case the game goals. Reading the Son blog and observing the practice of the gameplay mechanisms known as "Air Drops" within H1Z1 it is a total fallacy to claim the buying of air drops allows one to satisfy the game goals in a win state.
It is the exact opposite intention and mechanic. Stated flatly by Sony:
They can't be more upfront about their design and intention than that. More so is merely a rewording of what is already written in English.We have made the decision to allow paid for airdrops into the game with things like guns and other things being randomly selected as part of the airdrop. We’re making them highly contested and building a whole set of rules around this, but you should be aware that our goal is to make this a way to keep things interesting on the servers but still be contested. If these offend your sensibilities just know that they are going to be there. We have gone out of our way to make sure the airdrops are contested in-game and that you can’t simply expect to easily walk about to the airdrop and grab it. Even if you paid for it.
Last edited by Fencers; 2015-01-17 at 05:00 PM.
looks like dayz and rust mixed together. pass. that video someone posted made me not want the game after months of looking forward to it. ah well.
also yeah air drops should be contested.. but being able to buy air drops is just bullshit imo.
I'm still collecting infos on this game/project, but I might buy it, test it for what it is atm, than wait until its release (or just maybe in a better state) to play it more seriously.
I've been reading the comments on steam, I dont get why people get mad about a game in alpha state, specially since it will be f2p at release. Just wait for the official release if you are afraid that this 20$ will be lost. When I drop money on "on developpement" games (Rust, Space Engineers, KSP, Starbound, 7 days to die, and a lot lot more...), I expect them to be bugged, have server issues, have roll back, game breaking stuff, etc. If I wasnt comfortable with that, I'd just keep my money and wait for release. For me, its just a way to help the devs on project that interest me, but no one is forced to do so.
I think the air drops can and will be abused, on both sides (ordering the drop, and seeing/trying to get someone's drop) and will lead to just another shitty community. And I couldnt care less what sony says about it the pre-release. Its bad business. I hope I meet someone from sony, ill tell them im going to kick them in the nuts, so when I kick them in the nuts, it's ok, because I told them it was going to happen. Thems the rules now right?
any hackers yet?
they're bad enough in rust and dayz which you need to pay for... i just dont understand why they went with free to play.
The drops are specifically designed so that it encourages other people to steal them if they can, that's one of the main points of it.
That's not even remotely the same...
From what I've been reading/seen, yes.
Last edited by Edge-; 2015-01-18 at 12:37 AM.
get a group, pick an area.. buy lots of air drops. dont really care about the air drop. kill and loot everyone who comes snooping around. its not abusing air drops thats obviously a legitimate tactic to make the game more enjoyable.
How can it be abused in a manner that is not in violation of the TOS?
Using in-game means of securing the air drops is EXACTLY what Sony wants to happen in the creation of air drops. Sony wants that tension, contest and conflict to exist around air drops.
It is part of the rules of operation and intention of game design that air drops allow players to contest their delivery & acquisition. Players can chose to not buy the air drops. One can not guarantee their acquisition either way.
Caring is not required. It is simply what is known about the game beforehand, stated openly and publicly.And I couldnt care less what sony says about it the pre-release.
No, that would be assault. Which is illegal.I hope I meet someone from sony, ill tell them im going to kick them in the nuts, so when I kick them in the nuts, it's ok, because I told them it was going to happen. Thems the rules now right?
It is legal for a product to state it's use, operation and intention truthfully however. Which consumers can not file action against if the product is fit to purpose as stated by the product maker.
So no. "Thems" are not the rules, like at all actually.