And?...
I mean, there's a pretty robust multiplayer community for Battlefront and all over the years, but there's also a big group of folks who just liked the solo play. Battlefront 3 being on Frostbite engine is irrelevant.
Battlefront fans don't want Star Wars: Battlefield, they want Battlefront.
Dragon Age Inquisition used the Frostbite engine.
ME4 is using it.
Mirrors Edge 2 is using it.
Hell basically every EA non sports game is using it. Sports = Ignite engine everything else = Frostbite.
Not sure what the hell point you where trying to get across with that. EA invested a lot into DICE making the current Frostbite engine to use it on a wide variety of games.
http://www.gameinformer.com/
Go look at the poll they have up on their site. Now it isn't definitive proof that everyone plays the single player campaign for games like this, but it's more proof than you've provided.
You should dismiss their claim because it's really "We didn't have time."
BF4 was broken as hell and took months of development away from Battlefront.
The DICE had to roll in and do Hardlines MP as Visceral was barely able to finish the campaign.
All while Battlefront didn't get the delay it should have because DICE was swarmed in a 10 foot pile of shit EA dumped on them.
Any Star Wars game without a story/campaign to it is pretty damn sad tbh and a waste of the IP.
apparantly you never played diablo 2 enough to know what a travisty diablo 3 is.
Sales dont make a game good, it just means diablo 3 rode on the coatails that diablo 2 set down. I havnt met a single person who played diablo 2 for a meaningfull amount of time who has enjoyed diablo 3 more than 2.
Look I'm not going to get into this beyond this post. I played D2 for many years and would choose D3 over D2 in a heartbeat.
The only people saying D3 failed is random internet people. Any other metric used to score a games shows D3 was a massive success.
Anyways that is not the point of this thread. I won't reply about D3 again so if you want to continue it feel free to pm me.