"Some people in clinical studies of PrEP had early side effects such as an upset stomach or loss of appetite, but these were mild and usually went away within the first month. Some people also had a mild headache. No serious side effects were observed. You should tell your healthcare provider if these or other symptoms become severe or do not go away."
Yeah people should take it if they want.
While you live, shine / Have no grief at all / Life exists only for a short while / And time demands its toll.
Generally side effects are mild. Headache, nausea, sometimes vomiting and diarrhea. They usually go away within a few weeks of starting. Long-term side effects potentially include kidney damage and bone density problems, but then generally go away once someone stops taking it.
That's just the UK. They've been talking about this here in America, too, and it's not $360 a person.
It depends on the medication. Truvada mostly can cause liver or kidney damage, but it's not for sure and it's pretty rare. Most of the time it's upset stomachs and vivid, unusual dreams.
I find it kinda funny that Truvada had the vivid dreams but now the Complera I switched to has the insomnia. HIV medications seem to like to mess with our heads at night.
Is having safe sex so hard?
Time...line? Time isn't made out of lines. It is made out of circles. That is why clocks are round. ~ Caboose
The same can be said for a lot of things though. If you start excluding certain medication or treatments because people made bad descisions or whatever, where do you stop? Sure, it's an expensive and needless way to engage in risky behaviour, but like what about getting malaria jabs or pills or something when you go on holiday? "If you don't want to get malaria, don't go to such risky places" or not setting broken bones because "if you don't want to break your leg, don't engage in such risky sports like skateboarding" ... or not buying and giving out free condoms because "if you don't want to get pregnant, don't engage in such risky activities like sex".
It's the kind of argument that you can take and apply to virtually anything and there isn't a clear place to draw a line and say "anything more risky, or more expensive than X is not okay, but anything under that is fine we'll cover it". I do get what you're saying, but for the same reason that not handing out condoms in the hope it will stop people having sex is pointless - people are going to fuck and make bad descisions and so on regardless. If you don't offer them stuff like that, it's only going to make it worse.
Time...line? Time isn't made out of lines. It is made out of circles. That is why clocks are round. ~ Caboose
I'm generally not supportive of taking drugs as a preemptive measure when you can avoid the disease by simply wearing a condom.
You mean I can have natural non rubbered gay sex like god didn't intend just by taking a pill?
Well hand them over!
There is simple fundamental logic for things like this. In general, preventive care like a pill to avoid a disease is almost always cheaper in the long run than treating the disease itself.
People shouldn't be opposed to treatments like this. If people are going to be reckless and stupid they will be reckless and stupid regardless -- this just provides an added layer of protection. Just because someone has to wear a seat belt doesn't mean they are going to be more prone to drag racing than they were before.
Yes, there will be the odd exception here and there, but a course of treatment in a large population shouldn't be determined by the exceptions.
The unfortunate reality about PreP is that it will only be effective for a few years...maybe a decade if we get lucky. Someone, somewhere is going to treat it like Plan B and just take it sporadically, allowing the virus to mutate into a resistant form that then replaces the current strain, rendering PreP significantly less effective.
Aye but like, HIV is... Well. It's a really, really, really shit disease. Like, it spreads so much because people just have a lot of sex, but apparently your chances of ACTUALLY catching it are... quite low, you know, if you've slept with someone who has it just the one time or whatever. Obviously it does happen but it's not like some of these things that are wicked commincable and like everyone is going to get it just by sniffing your junk through your jeans or something. It's only such a horror show because at this point so many people in the world have it, and you can live so long with it so you can spread it around for many years before you die, possibly without even knowing. But stuff like this... It's like playing starcraft. If you can only win games with a 6pool or like proxy zealots or something, you might win a bunch of games on ladder, but it's pretty counterable by doing certain pretty easy things, and I kind of feel that way about HIV. Anything you can do to just reduce the numbers of people who have it / catch it / whatever, even if it's just for a few years, you're directly countering HIV's only strat, you know? It's not like, I dunno, the flu or something, where you're like "okay tons of people are catching it through... droplets or something from sneezes this year so we'll issue a ton of masks to everyone and that'll cut down the numbers, but then next year flu comes back with a new build and this time it's not making people sneeze so much maybe but it's all of a sudden really communicable through... I dunno saliva or something so your masks are all useless cause everyone starts catching it from making out too much
Imma gonna just stop you here before you went on your starcraft tangent that I couldn't follow.
But yes, HIV is actually fairly difficult to contract. There are a number of things that increase your risk factors. And then there are the 5% or so of the population that is immune because they are lacking some "insert medical jargon here" that doesn't allow the virus to take.
There is some hope, not only in a cure, but also in getting the disease so manageable that it spreads slower and slower. Many people on HIV medication reduce the effect of the virus to the point they aren't likely to spread it to another.