For some reason i now have a mental picture of the Monthy python sketch with the after eight mint.
Bullet sir?
The planning part had to do with the artifacts he wanted found on him by later archeologists. He had spent several days deciding, much longer than he had spent deciding to kill himself. He would be found lying on his back, on his bed, with a copy of Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead and an unfinished letter to Exxon, protesting the cancellation of his gas credit card. That way, he would indict the system, and achieve something by his death, over and above what the death itself achieved.
One time, I was sitting in an international style buffet, nothing too unusual. You've seen a million that are basically the same. I had only recently arrived and was preparing to leave for the food counters after ordering my drink. Then I noticed an unfolding situation, in which a very large man was being confronted by a short, middle-aged Chinese man, who was clearly either the manager or on the management staff of the establishment. He had a very, very thick accent. The man's table was strewn with at least a dozen plates, 10 glasses, and a whole lot of cloth napkins. Now, most of these buffets have clear signs showing that there's a built in time limit, or that have rules against wasting the food or disposing of too much of it, so let that be a little bit of context. The conversation went something like this:
Manager: "You must leave now."
Large Man: "What? Why?"
Manager: "You here for four hours. You waste the food."
Large Man: Wait, wait! That's not true. I've eaten everything I took back to the table!"
Without missing a beat the manager strikes back with "You can eat food and still waste it."
This was before the cursing out began. But that zinger always stuck with me.
Killing yourself is a good way to prove your sanity.
Whoever loves let him flourish. / Let him perish who knows not love. / Let him perish twice who forbids love. - Pompeii
No. Based on what I read, the man was depressed for some time and on top of that was harassing employees...in no way would a court hold a restaurant liable for a suicide due to denial of service.
Store giveaways like "food for life" or "lifetime supply of dog food" tend to have stipulations in the contract for contrast entry, so the buffet might have been well within its rights to terminate such a contract.
I didn't read anything in the article what would lead to reasonable suspicion that the buffet was trying to make his experiences "as miserable as possible", I suppose it's possible but I think it's more likely that the individual in question had some issues with mental illness.
Good riddance. I'm glad he removed himself from the gene pool.
Cutting off service for not following rules = Making him kill himself?
Quite the leap in logic there, even for you Orlong!