How are we going to get those minerals off the moon?
Nobody has ever returned from the surface of another planet/moon, that's why we send robots to gather data.
How are we going to get those minerals off the moon?
Nobody has ever returned from the surface of another planet/moon, that's why we send robots to gather data.
This makes me think of the film 'the time machine', where the main actor ends up in 2030 at some point, to find a world in distress, as a chunk of the moon has broken off due to mining and is going to crash on earth, so they try to evacuate as many people as they can.
Now on topic. It would be quite feasable and also would add more money into the economy, as our current economical system is only based and what we can get from the earth. But I see moon mining as only a good idea to make the moon into a spaceport, as you it actually costs the most for space industries to actually get through the gravitational pull from the earth, launching from the moon would be a lot cheaper.
And also there are huge underground caves on the moon that could house entire cities, Maybe if we can grow some crops with modern techiniques like hydroponics or aeroponics, we might be able to create artificial oxigen and in the end house entire cities underneath the surface of the moon (maybe those are the strange lights we see on ceres?).
im all for mining on the moon. the Moon is just a freeloading rock orbiting around us anyway, so who cares if we start mining it. Plus we cant let china have the only source of Rems. thats a big mistake. the US needs to step up and claim that planet before China or Russia tries anything.
Then wouldn't the US, Russia, China and....India(?) have a monopoly on whats in the moon?
If not for that crumby treaty the moon would be the 51st state and we could have painted that bitch red, white, and blue so every night the entire world could bask in our freedom.
Damn treaty.
I like looking at the moon, I'd hate to see it covered in mine shafts and such.
I meant, if our activity on the moon would cause any disturbance in the moons gravitational pull, maybe at some point in the far future it would drift away from earth or crash into earth, either way it will not be 'reflecting' light onto earth anymore.
Ofcourse we are not going to feel it in our lifetime, and our shortsightedness is where we fail as humans.
How dare you disturbing Andy Kaufman....
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
We could mine the moon at a staggering rate and it would have less of an effect on these things than the amount of drift that the moon naturally has.I actually see this as the biggest hurdle. The moon is part of every single culture ever. Everyone has seen the moon, and knows what it looks like. It would be quite unsettling to see it covered in machinery. Personally, I'd still go for it, because exploring the galaxy is awesomesauce.
Ppl in this thread dont realize how insanely expensive and polluting it is to send things into space..
every supply and that whould have to be sent there whould be very expensive both economicly and envorimentally..
Until we have a space elevator i dont think we should send anything but exploration missions and sattelites into space.
i honestly rarely see the moon or the stars anymore. maybe somebody mined them already and no1 told us? even if people started mining on it i doubt u could see the moons surface change every through a telescope. it would still look like a giant shiny white orb regardless of how much people mined it. we gotta start planning for the future anyway. if we run outta materials and one country holds the majority, thats very bad news.