Fox News poll: Jeb Bush 45%, Hillary Clinton 44%

[Orbitus]

I don't remember Fox saying landslide, but at least a popular vote win. Even Trump was on the air frothing at Obama losing the popular vote. From stuff I saw recently, they had polls saying 1% lead to Romney, with it being a tie the day off. I think the link was provided to me somewhere in this thread.

http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/20...win-landslide/

Just for a little back up of what I said.

[Deleted]

This coming from a European who doesn't give two shites about politics..

If you vote in another Bush? you are bat shit crazy America. What is wrong with you./

[Merkava]

http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/20...win-landslide/

Just for a little back up of what I said.

Dick Morris = FoxNews now?

[Slant]

I pray for you guys that Hillary wins. Also, having watched some Youtube videos about your debates... I think the media may be overdoing the whole debate shit thing. Policies are important, now hand gestures or how someone stands...

[cubby]

If even Fox news can't make polls more than 1% in favor of the GOP does that mean easy win for the dems ?

Yeah, the 2016 election is going to be another slaughter. The GOP will see the inside of the White House about four years after they pull their collective heads out of their asses (and cold cock the Tea Party idiots).

[Orbitus]

Dick Morris = FoxNews now?

I opened this post knowing full well you were going to play the semantics bullshit. Both he and Karl Rove said the same thing. That Romney would be president and both saying up over 320 electoral votes. They were right that someone would win with 320+ votes but it wasn't who they thought was going to win. They said the polls were wrong and the polls were very much right. Which is again, what is happening now. Dick Morris hasn't been seen since this but Karl Rove or should I say, Ham Rove, has been on Fox News quite a few times since his melt down of election night when he was wrong and DEAD wrong.

[Elegiac]

I'm calling it right now: there is NO WAY USA would elect ANY female president for at least another generation.

Yeah, who knows what a post-menopausal woman might do on her period?

[Matchles]

As a liberal, I absolutely love watching things like this.

[Lord Havik]

Fox News poll: Jeb Bush 45%, Hillary Clinton 44%

Microsoft News Poll: Xbox One 9001%, PS4 -0.80085%

[MatadorMedia]

I think it's more shocking that Fox News watchers are polling much higher support for a Democrat than (what I would think) is normal. Fox has notoriously Republican viewership, which may indicate Clinton has Republican support, probably especially in the older generations. Hillary already has this election won as far as I'm concerned unless the entire Internet shows up to the polls to troll America by voting for Trump... which, let's get real, the Internet isn't going outside for anything.

[Merkava]

I opened this post knowing full well you were going to play the semantics bullshit. Both he and Karl Rove said the same thing. That Romney would be president and both saying up over 320 electoral votes. They were right that someone would win with 320+ votes but it wasn't who they thought was going to win. They said the polls were wrong and the polls were very much right. Which is again, what is happening now. Dick Morris hasn't been seen since this but Karl Rove or should I say, Ham Rove, has been on Fox News quite a few times since his melt down of election night when he was wrong and DEAD wrong.

It doesn't matter what they said. It doesn't matter what if they were right or wrong. And semantics have nothing to do with it. If Rove would have said the same thing on Meet the Press would it make it an NBC News prediction?

As I've pointed out to you guys before, you seem to be entirely ignorant of the concept of news panel discussion programs where guests give their opinions. As often as Christopher Hitchens was on CSPAN, I never once heard anyone accuse the network of holding the opinion that Mother Teresa was a lying, stealing, Albanian dwarf.

- - - Updated - - -

I think it's more shocking that Fox News watchers are polling much higher support for a Democrat than (what I would think) is normal. Fox has notoriously Republican viewership, which may indicate Clinton has Republican support, probably especially in the older generations. .

Why do you think this is a poll of FoxNews viewers?

[namelessone]

I'll call that you're wrong right now

When it happens, I invite you to message me and gloat. I'd even buy you a beer or maybe a car even.

[MatadorMedia]

Why do you think this is a poll of FoxNews viewers?

Because that's the title of the thread.

[Matchles]

Because that's the title of the thread.

We might want to take note of the day and time because I'm with Merkava on this one. Their poll is a random cross sample of landline numbers nationwide, not just Fox News viewers.

But that is not to say there are no problems with the polls.

[belfpala]

As a liberal, I absolutely love watching things like this.

/takes a break from kitchen
/goes out to bar to refill my water
/listens
/what, people like this exist?
/fuck it, I trust a chicken breast more than you people.

[Ghostpanther]

As a liberal, I absolutely love watching things like this.

As a conservative, who watched the whole video, I absolutely loved watching it. Thanks for sharing.

[Matchles]

As a conservative, who watched the whole video, I absolutely loved watching it. Thanks for sharing.

No problem. I'm guessing there is something for everyone there. Where I see dysfunction, you see passion.