Why?
Because Romanians can backstab better?
- - - Updated - - -
Like i already said Hungary was forced because of the Dual monarchy.
- - - Updated - - -
Well Hungarys problems are largely because of Trianon and Communism......
Why?
Because Romanians can backstab better?
- - - Updated - - -
Like i already said Hungary was forced because of the Dual monarchy.
- - - Updated - - -
Well Hungarys problems are largely because of Trianon and Communism......
You propose to perform an even greater unjust act against the ethnic majority? And the racial sterotypes and xenophobia doenst help your case.
We had all those backstabbing story after WW1 here too in germany and of cource they are mostly bullshit trying to hide the shamefull loss.
Hungarians leave this country at a rather alarming rate, especially lately. Technically those in Romania might come here, as the living standards are somewhat better (if I recall correctly). But considering that the current governments is against immigration, even that looks fishy.
'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
But, SURPRISE, it hasn't been controlled by Hungarians for 100 years.
Finland lost Karelia to USSR in WW2. How did we leave it to them? Empty. We relocated over 420k people to other parts of Finland (11% of whole population). One day we will have Karelia back one way or another. And how will we have it back? Empty.
As I understand it, the Hungarian revanchist position revolves around the points that #1) their surrender was predicated on having a negotiated peace, and were instead presented with a fait accompli treaty, and the related, #2) that regions would be allowed true self-determination (i.e. voting to see which country they wanted to be part of) and instead the Entente powers just drew some (arguably ignorant) lines for new borders and called it good.
None of that makes the Austro-Hungarian Empire (or its successors states) good or "right", but they do appear to be valid criticisms that went unaddressed for the better part of a century because: WWII and Cold War.
To a great extent it doesn't matter who "started the war" (or to a much lesser extent, even who "won" it) - if you end up with a peace that isn't acceptable in the long term to both sides, you're just banking the coals for another war. This was known at the time, and the victors pushed it through anyways, and the world has been suffering the effects ever since: WWII, instability in the Middle-East, and more were all heavily influenced (if not out-right caused) by how WWI was concluded. This was a mistake that American and the Allies generally did not make after WWII (sadly, the bitter sort of lessons taught by war tend to only last a half-century or so).
The other alternative to a just peace is to do what Rome did to Carthage, but that is far, far harder (both logistically and morally) and does its own sort of damage to the nation that inflicts such a "peace".
"In today’s America, conservatives who actually want to conserve are as rare as liberals who actually want to liberate. The once-significant language of an earlier era has had the meaning sucked right out of it, the better to serve as camouflage for a kleptocratic feeding frenzy in which both establishment parties participate with equal abandon" (Taking a break from the criminal, incompetent liars at the NSA, to bring you the above political observation, from The Archdruid Report.)
I know about the situation in Karelia.
I also know about the situation in Mari/Komi and Perm.
But the problem is relocating them would end the Hungarian presence and culture there.
- - - Updated - - -
Well most of them happens in post-Soviet/Communist countries so i account this too.
Nonsense. There's still a bunch of ethnic Germans living in France (Alsace/Lorraine). Do you think they were better off when France and Germany were fighting over that territory for centuries? Or now that France and Germany have decided to set aside their differences and move on?
Do you think that if Japan continued to hold a grudge against the US for Hiroshima/Nagasaki, or the US for Pearl Harbor, they would have been able to become the massive economic powerhouse they are today?
Societies are almost always better off when people can put their grudges behind them and move forward together.
'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
It's not like some of the land was redistributed to Hungary from the Slavs (Slovaks and the Czechs) *cough* lets not forget about that ey?
-K
There are no borders. Just in your mind.
Plenty of options. Most likely through diplomatic means eventually. We had a great opportunity to take back Karelia when USSR fell down, but our sheep president Koivisto shat in his pants and did nothing. Russia is bound to fall sooner or later, then we will grab Karelia. Just have to patiently wait.
The US threw Japanese Americans in concentration camps during WWII. We then continued to discriminate against them for a while after. Ask Japanese Americans if they were better off continuing to gripe about past atrocities, or if they were better off pushing through the discrimination and hatred to make their way towards their future.
'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
But soon after Mr Xi secured a third term, Apple released a new version of the feature in China, limiting its scope. Now Chinese users of iPhones and other Apple devices are restricted to a 10-minute window when receiving files from people who are not listed as a contact. After 10 minutes, users can only receive files from contacts.
Apple did not explain why the update was first introduced in China, but over the years, the tech giant has been criticised for appeasing Beijing.