Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst
1
2
3
  1. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukh View Post
    It's like a nervous twitch for some people. They probably got called out one time for having a really bad opinion and now they're spending the rest of their life justifying why it's really all feminists fault and not their fault for saying it.
    But it is. The evolutionary choice of females in mammals was to find larger, stronger, more capable males. Dam near all other life that is female/male, the male just needs to look pretty and give them some seed. This was even true for dinosaurs I.E. the female trex was larger then the male).

  2. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by Saucexorzski View Post
    But it is. The evolutionary choice of females in mammals was to find larger, stronger, more capable males. Dam near all other life that is female/male, the male just needs to look pretty and give them some seed. This was even true for dinosaurs I.E. the female trex was larger then the male).
    This is just not true. Sexual dimorphism varies greatly from family to family. Not family unit family, but classification family. It can even vary within genus. This is across phyla lines that this variance happens. From birds to mammals to fish. There are plenty of examples where males are larger and where females are larger and where it's hard to even tell the difference between the sexes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •