Someone asked if it was legal I repsonded. That's why I stated it, so obviously not " EVERYONE KNOWS THAT ".
So you obviously have missed the point of the conversation, and are making yourself look rather foolish.
Quote me where I said " Well they can so they should ", go a head, I'll wait.
They were hired, wether or not it's provoking isn;t a debate I was having with anyone, I simply stated there isn;t anything anyone can do about it.
So because me proving that reporters are being attacked by people, beaten, and robbed, you're offended by it?
Seriously, is someone else using your account tonight?
Oh yeah, just refuting the "he hired them" narrative since according to the journalist they're "protecting"
which doesn't scream of "they're just begrudgingly fulfilling a contract you guys, not agitating or anything...." as if they wouldn't have been there had someone not hired them.Joe Biggs, a reporter for infowars.com who is currently reporting in Ferguson, told the Guardian that he was contacted by members of the local Oath Keepers chapter prior to arriving in the town late on Monday night, offering to provide security for him while he is working there.
It's funny that they're so anti-government though yet they're touting their familiarity and acceptance by the police.
Last edited by Shadowmelded; 2015-08-12 at 02:48 AM.
Who are objective worse the people who actually harmed other people or the so called militia?
It's time for the far left in this thread to come out.
Remember this is the same group that threatened federal official at the Bundy Ranch, so I guess Government > Angry Minorities for these guys or something.
I thiink most people are on the same page that it wasn't a good idea, but people seem to be confused by saying " Well it's not illegal", they assume that we are supporting their cause. Stop doing that.
Edit: If they are hired, as security, then they are doing their job, and I can't say " well fuck them ", but I don't think hiring them will help with the situation in ferguson.
Do these men live, there, are they were they given legal authority to be there, and if so by whom, I don't need to entertain whether it was or wasn't a bad fucking idea, because, unlike some I am not fishing for a reason to defend their being their, I know damn well if those protesters started arming themselves, or DO this is going to be one of those things, that serves as another clear example of why they should be protesting in the first place.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
The constituion gave them the legal authority, they don't have to live here, most states recognize other states right to carry ID's. These protestors already have armed themselves, as was illustrated in another thread when a security camera caught a person firing on police.