Originally Posted by
Slant
Because I wanted to counter your usual subliminal racism. See, when someone says "We don't have a problem with gypsy children killing people in Europe" and you say "it happens in sweden from time to time", you may be technically correct... but it implies that they are a particular problem. So I pointed out that Swedes also kill people, just to make sure everyone knows that your "from time to time" is as large or as little a problem as any regular criminal happens to be. By doing that, I wanted to imply that them being Gypsy has absolutely no relevance to the question if murderers should be treated as murderers. That is the non-racist view.
Is that clear enough for you?